Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick Benjamin

dblp:311/8906 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › specification
specification learning
0.512021
Adaptation2: Adapting Specification Learners in Assured Adaptive Systems · ASE 2021
Automated reasoning and model checking
controller synthesis
0.512021
Adaptation2: Adapting Specification Learners in Assured Adaptive Systems · ASE 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.112021
Adaptation2: Adapting Specification Learners in Assured Adaptive Systems · ASE 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

specification learning · 1.5reinforcement learning · 1.5controller synthesis · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Towards User-Centred Design of AI-Assisted Decision-Making in Law Enforcement
Vesna Nowack, Dalal Alrajeh, Carolina Gutierrez Muñoz, Katie Thomas, William Hobson, Patrick Benjamin, Catherine Hamilton-Giachritsis, Tim D. Grant, Juliane A. Kloess, Jessica Woodhams
EASE6
2021 Adaptation2: Adapting Specification Learners in Assured Adaptive Systems
abstract
Specification learning and controller synthesis are two methods that promise to provide control systems with assured adaptive capabilities at run-time. Specification learning can automatically update specifications in light of violation traces observed within the operational environment. Controller synthesis can then automatically generate implementations that are guaranteed to satisfy these specifications in every environment.Specification learning is implemented using general-purpose AI systems. These systems are highly configurable, and the configuration choice heavily affects the effectiveness. Setting configuration parameters is far from obvious as they bear no clear semantic relation with the adaptation task. State of the art requires configurations to be set by domain experts at design time for each application domain.In this paper, we argue that to create assured control systems that can effectively and efficiently adapt at run-time, the learning systems upon which they are built must also have adaptive learning strategies for determining configurations at runtime. We demonstrate this idea with a proof-of-concept that computes domain-dependent policies using reinforcement learning.
Dalal Alrajeh, Patrick Benjamin, Sebastián Uchitel
ASE2