Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dan Karliner
dblp:314/6510
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Coding theory · 67% Computational complexity · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
locally decodable codes |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Plane Test Is a Local Tester for Multiplicity Codes · CCC 2022 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › locally decodable codes
multiplicity codes |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Plane Test Is a Local Tester for Multiplicity Codes · CCC 2022 |
Computational complexity
property testing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Plane Test Is a Local Tester for Multiplicity Codes · CCC 2022 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Improved Local Testing for Multiplicity CodesabstractMultiplicity codes are a generalization of Reed-Muller codes which include derivatives as well as the values of low degree polynomials, evaluated in every point in 𝔽_p^m. Similarly to Reed-Muller codes, multiplicity codes have a local nature that allows for local correction and local testing. Recently, [Karliner et al., 2022] showed that the plane test, which tests the degree of the codeword on a random plane, is a good local tester for small enough degrees. In this work we simplify and extend the analysis of local testing for multiplicity codes, giving a more general and tight analysis. In particular, we show that multiplicity codes MRM_p(m, d, s) over prime fields with arbitrary d are locally testable by an appropriate k-flat test, which tests the degree of the codeword on a random k-dimensional affine subspace. The relationship between the degree parameter d and the required dimension k is shown to be nearly optimal, and improves on [Karliner et al., 2022] in the case of planes. Our analysis relies on a generalization of the technique of canonincal monomials introduced in [Haramaty et al., 2013]. Generalizing canonical monomials to the multiplicity case requires substantially different proofs which exploit the algebraic structure of multiplicity codes. Dan Karliner, Amnon Ta-Shma |
APPROX/RANDOM | 1 |
| 2022 | The Plane Test Is a Local Tester for Multiplicity Codes
Dan Karliner, Roie Salama, Amnon Ta-Shma |
CCC | 1 |