Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Allen Mi
dblp:314/6588
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-3159-9023ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Hardware security and side channels · 79% Privacy and data protection · 21% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Emerging computing paradigms
quantum computer architecture |
0.8 | 2 | 2023 | Securing Reset Operations in NISQ Quantum Computers · CCS 2022 Securing NISQ Quantum Computer Reset Operations Against Higher Energy State Attacks · CCS 2023 |
Hardware security and side channels
quantum computer security |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Securing NISQ Quantum Computer Reset Operations Against Higher Energy State Attacks · CCS 2023 |
Privacy and data protection
information leakage |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Securing Reset Operations in NISQ Quantum Computers · CCS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
higher-energy state attack · 1.3cascading secure reset · 1.3crosstalk analysis · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Securing NISQ Quantum Computer Reset Operations Against Higher Energy State AttacksabstractEnabling the sharing of quantum computers among different users requires a secure reset operation that can reset the state of a qubit to ground state |0> and prevent leakage of the state to a post-reset circuit. This work highlights that the existing reset operations available in superconducting qubit NISQ quantum computers are not fully secure. In particular, this work demonstrates for the first time a new type of higher-energy state attack. Although NISQ quantum computers are typically abstracted as working with only energy states |0> and |1>, this work shows that it is possible for unprivileged users to set the qubit state to |2 or |3>. By breaking the abstraction of a two-level system, the new higher-energy state attack can be deployed to affect the operation of circuits or for covert communication between circuits. This work shows that common reset protocols are ineffective in resetting a qubit from a higher-energy state. To provide a defense, this work proposes a new Cascading Secure Reset (CSR) operation. CSR, without hardware modifications, is able to efficiently and reliably reset higher-energy states back to |0>. CSR achieves a reduction in |3> -initialized state leakage channel capacity by between 1 and 2 orders of magnitude, and does so with a 25x speedup compared with the default decoherence reset. Chuanqi Xu, Jessie Chen, Allen Mi, Jakub Szefer |
CCS | 3 |
| 2022 | Securing Reset Operations in NISQ Quantum ComputersabstractA secure reset operation could be an enabling technology that allows sharing of a quantum computer among different users, or among different quantum programs of the same user. Today, the dominant method to erase the qubit state is a full system wipe, which effectively resets all the qubits at the same time. In today's superconducting qubit machines from IBM, for example, a full system wipe takes up to 1000 μs, and it fully erases all information in the system. However, with a full system wipe there is no means for only a few qubits to be cleared and assigned to a new user or program; everything has to be erased at the same time. A secure reset operation could allow resetting only a subset of qubits, and it could be built upon existing (insecure) reset operation available from superconducting qubit machines from IBM, for example. The (insecure) reset operation is available today, which can be used to reset the state of a qubit in a time on the order of 10 μs down to 1 μs. The reset operation is thus much faster than a full system wipe. However, as this work demonstrates, it is possible to leak some information across the (insecure) reset operation as it does not perfectly reset the qubit state between two users or programs who may be sequentially scheduled on the same qubit. Further, crosstalk-like effects are observed where reset behavior of one qubit can be inferred from an adjacent qubit. This work analyzes the existing (insecure) reset operation in order to understand how a secure reset operation could be built upon it. This work then describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of the proposed secure reset operation which can reset qubits without leaking information, and retains a factor of 300 speedup over a full system~wipe. Allen Mi, Shuwen Deng, Jakub Szefer |
CCS | 1 |