Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cheng Jian

dblp:315/2946 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5831-7129ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 70% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing › document image analysis
character recognition
0.712023
M5HisDoc: A Large-scale Multi-style Chinese Historical Document Analysis Benchmark · NeurIPS 2023
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image analysis › image understanding
historical document analysis
0.712023
M5HisDoc: A Large-scale Multi-style Chinese Historical Document Analysis Benchmark · NeurIPS 2023
Image and video processing › document image analysis › document layout analysis
text line detection
0.712023
M5HisDoc: A Large-scale Multi-style Chinese Historical Document Analysis Benchmark · NeurIPS 2023
Image and video processing › document image analysis
text recognition
0.712023
M5HisDoc: A Large-scale Multi-style Chinese Historical Document Analysis Benchmark · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

deep learning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 RSMA-assisted SHAPTINs: secrecy performance under imperfect hardware and channel estimation errors
Feng Zhou 0010, Kefeng Guo, Cheng Jian, Sunder Ali Khowaja, Kapal Dev, G. Thippa Reddy, Hussam M. N. Al Hamadi
Neural Comput. Appl.3
2023 HisDoc R-CNN: Robust Chinese Historical Document Text Line Detection with Dynamic Rotational Proposal Network and Iterative Attention Head
Cheng Jian, Lingyu Liang, Chongyu Liu
ICDAR (1)1
2023 M5HisDoc: A Large-scale Multi-style Chinese Historical Document Analysis Benchmark
abstract
Recognizing and organizing text in correct reading order plays a crucial role in historical document analysis and preservation. While existing methods have shown promising performance, they often struggle with challenges such as diverse layouts, low image quality, style variations, and distortions. This is primarily due to the lack of consideration for these issues in the current benchmarks, which hinders the development and evaluation of historical document analysis and recognition (HDAR) methods in complex real-world scenarios. To address this gap, this paper introduces a complex multi-style Chinese historical document analysis benchmark, named M5HisDoc. The M5 indicates five properties of style, ie., Multiple layouts, Multiple document types, Multiple calligraphy styles, Multiple backgrounds, and Multiple challenges. The M5HisDoc dataset consists of two subsets, M5HisDoc-R (Regular) and M5HisDoc-H (Hard). The M5HisDoc-R subset comprises 4,000 historical document images. To ensure high-quality annotations, we meticulously perform manual annotation and triple-checking. To replicate real-world conditions for historical document analysis applications, we incorporate image rotation, distortion, and resolution reduction into M5HisDoc-R subset to form a new challenging subset named M5HisDoc-H, which contains the same number of images as M5HisDoc-R. The dataset exhibits diverse styles, significant scale variations, dense texts, and an extensive character set. We conduct benchmarking experiments on five tasks: text line detection, text line recognition, character detection, character recognition, and reading order prediction. We also conduct cross-validation with other benchmarks. Experimental results demonstrate that the M5HisDoc dataset can offer new challenges and great opportunities for future research in this field, thereby providing deep insights into the solution for HDAR. The dataset is available at https://github.com/HCIILAB/M5HisDoc.
Yongxin Shi, Chongyu Liu, Dezhi Peng, Cheng Jian, Jiarong Huang
NeurIPS4
2022 SCUT-CAB: A New Benchmark Dataset of Ancient Chinese Books with Complex Layouts for Document Layout Analysis
Hiuyi Cheng, Cheng Jian, Sihang Wu
ICFHR2