Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiyin Cao

dblp:315/5641 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-0227-3697ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational social science and digital humanities › cultural analysis
cultural differences
0.712023
Cultural Differences in Friendship Network Behaviors: A Snapchat Case Study · CHI 2023
Computational social science and digital humanities
online behavior
0.712023
Cultural Differences in Friendship Network Behaviors: A Snapchat Case Study · CHI 2023
Collaborative and social computing
social media
0.712023
Cultural Differences in Friendship Network Behaviors: A Snapchat Case Study · CHI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regression model · 2.0network analysis · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Cultural Differences in Friendship Network Behaviors: A Snapchat Case Study
abstract
Culture shapes people’s behavior, both online and offline. Surprisingly, there is sparse research on how cultural context affects network formation and content consumption on social media. We analyzed the friendship networks and dyadic relations between content producers and consumers across 73 countries through a cultural lens in a closed-network setting. Closed networks allow for intimate bonds and self-expression, providing a natural setting to study cultural differences in behavior. We studied three theoretical frameworks of culture - individualism, relational mobility, and tightness. We found that friendship networks formed across different cultures differ in egocentricity, meaning the connectedness between a user’s friends. Individualism, mobility, and looseness also significantly negatively impact how tie strength affects content consumption. Our findings show how culture affects social media behavior, and we outline how researchers can incorporate this in their work. Our work has implications for content recommendations and can improve content engagement.
Agrima Seth, Jiyin Cao, Ron Dotsch, Yozen Liu, Maarten W. Bos
CHI2