Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Viet Anh Khoa Tran
dblp:316/0270
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning paradigms · 42% Machine translation · 27% Representation and self-supervised learning · 27% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
class-incremental learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Contrastive Consolidation of Top-Down Modulations Achieves Sparsely Supervised Continual Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Contrastive Consolidation of Top-Down Modulations Achieves Sparsely Supervised Continual Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Contrastive Consolidation of Top-Down Modulations Achieves Sparsely Supervised Continual Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › speech translation
cascaded speech translation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation? · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
speech translation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation? · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › invariant representation learning
view-invariant representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Contrastive Consolidation of Top-Down Modulations Achieves Sparsely Supervised Continual Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation? · EMNLP 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
top-down modulation · 0.9predictive coding · 0.9contrastive loss · 0.9marginalizing transcription posteriors · 0.6joint training · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Contrastive Consolidation of Top-Down Modulations Achieves Sparsely Supervised Continual LearningabstractBiological brains learn continually from a stream of unlabeled data, while integrating specialized information from sparsely labeled examples without compromising their ability to generalize.
Meanwhile, machine learning methods are susceptible to catastrophic forgetting in this natural learning setting, as supervised specialist fine-tuning degrades performance on the original task.
We introduce task-modulated contrastive learning (TMCL), which takes inspiration from the biophysical machinery in the neocortex, using predictive coding principles to integrate top-down information continually and without supervision.
We follow the idea that these principles build a view-invariant representation space, and that this can be implemented using a contrastive loss.
Then, whenever labeled samples of a new class occur, new affine modulations are learned that improve separation of the new class from all others, without affecting feedforward weights.
By co-opting the view-invariance learning mechanism, we then train feedforward weights to match the unmodulated representation of a data sample to its modulated counterparts.
This introduces modulation invariance into the representation space, and, by also using past modulations, stabilizes it.
Our experiments show improvements in both class-incremental and transfer learning over state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches, as well as over comparable supervised approaches, using as few as 1% of available labels.
Taken together, our work suggests that top-down modulations play a crucial role in balancing stability and plasticity. Viet Anh Khoa Tran, Emre Neftci, Willem A. M. Wybo |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation?abstractCurrently, in speech translation, the straightforward approach -cascading a recognition system with a translation system -delivers state-of-theart results.However, fundamental challenges such as error propagation from the automatic speech recognition system still remain.To mitigate these problems, recently, people turn their attention to direct data and propose various joint training methods.In this work, we seek to answer the question of whether joint training really helps cascaded speech translation.We review recent papers on the topic and also investigate a joint training criterion by marginalizing the transcription posterior probabilities.Our findings show that a strong cascaded baseline can diminish any improvements obtained using joint training, and we suggest alternatives to joint training.We hope this work can serve as a refresher of the current speech translation landscape, and motivate research in finding more efficient and creative ways to utilize the direct data for speech translation. Viet Anh Khoa Tran, David Thulke, Yingbo Gao, Christian Herold, Hermann Ney |
EMNLP | 1 |