Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Viet Anh Khoa Tran

dblp:316/0270 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning paradigms · 42% Machine translation · 27% Representation and self-supervised learning · 27%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
class-incremental learning
0.912025
Contrastive Consolidation of Top-Down Modulations Achieves Sparsely Supervised Continual Learning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning
0.912025
Contrastive Consolidation of Top-Down Modulations Achieves Sparsely Supervised Continual Learning · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.912025
Contrastive Consolidation of Top-Down Modulations Achieves Sparsely Supervised Continual Learning · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › speech translation
cascaded speech translation
0.612022
Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation? · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
speech translation
0.612022
Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation? · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › invariant representation learning
view-invariant representation
0.312025
Contrastive Consolidation of Top-Down Modulations Achieves Sparsely Supervised Continual Learning · NeurIPS 2025
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
automatic speech recognition
0.212022
Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation? · EMNLP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

top-down modulation · 0.9predictive coding · 0.9contrastive loss · 0.9marginalizing transcription posteriors · 0.6joint training · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Contrastive Consolidation of Top-Down Modulations Achieves Sparsely Supervised Continual Learning
abstract
Biological brains learn continually from a stream of unlabeled data, while integrating specialized information from sparsely labeled examples without compromising their ability to generalize. Meanwhile, machine learning methods are susceptible to catastrophic forgetting in this natural learning setting, as supervised specialist fine-tuning degrades performance on the original task. We introduce task-modulated contrastive learning (TMCL), which takes inspiration from the biophysical machinery in the neocortex, using predictive coding principles to integrate top-down information continually and without supervision. We follow the idea that these principles build a view-invariant representation space, and that this can be implemented using a contrastive loss. Then, whenever labeled samples of a new class occur, new affine modulations are learned that improve separation of the new class from all others, without affecting feedforward weights. By co-opting the view-invariance learning mechanism, we then train feedforward weights to match the unmodulated representation of a data sample to its modulated counterparts. This introduces modulation invariance into the representation space, and, by also using past modulations, stabilizes it. Our experiments show improvements in both class-incremental and transfer learning over state-of-the-art unsupervised approaches, as well as over comparable supervised approaches, using as few as 1% of available labels. Taken together, our work suggests that top-down modulations play a crucial role in balancing stability and plasticity.
Viet Anh Khoa Tran, Emre Neftci, Willem A. M. Wybo
NeurIPS1
2022 Does Joint Training Really Help Cascaded Speech Translation?
abstract
Currently, in speech translation, the straightforward approach -cascading a recognition system with a translation system -delivers state-of-theart results.However, fundamental challenges such as error propagation from the automatic speech recognition system still remain.To mitigate these problems, recently, people turn their attention to direct data and propose various joint training methods.In this work, we seek to answer the question of whether joint training really helps cascaded speech translation.We review recent papers on the topic and also investigate a joint training criterion by marginalizing the transcription posterior probabilities.Our findings show that a strong cascaded baseline can diminish any improvements obtained using joint training, and we suggest alternatives to joint training.We hope this work can serve as a refresher of the current speech translation landscape, and motivate research in finding more efficient and creative ways to utilize the direct data for speech translation.
Viet Anh Khoa Tran, David Thulke, Yingbo Gao, Christian Herold, Hermann Ney
EMNLP1