Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Louis Kraft
dblp:316/9101
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6465-4973ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution › evolutionary bioinformatics
ancient DNA analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | <tt>AdDeam</tt> : a fast and scalable tool for estimating and clustering reference-level damage profiles · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metagenomics |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | <tt>AdDeam</tt> : a fast and scalable tool for estimating and clustering reference-level damage profiles · Bioinform. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
principal component analysis · 0.9clustering · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | <tt>AdDeam</tt> : a fast and scalable tool for estimating and clustering reference-level damage profilesabstractMOTIVATION: DNA damage patterns, such as increased frequencies of C→T and G→A substitutions at fragment ends, are widely used in ancient DNA studies to assess authenticity and detect contamination. In metagenomic studies, fragments can be mapped against multiple references or de novo assembled contigs to identify those likely to be ancient. Generating and comparing damage profiles, however, can be both tedious and time-consuming. Although tools exist for estimating damage in single reference genomes and metagenomic datasets, none efficiently cluster damage patterns. RESULTS: To address this methodological gap, we developed AdDeam, a tool that combines rapid damage estimation with clustering for streamlined analyses and easy identification of potential contaminants or outliers. Our tool takes aligned ancient DNA (aDNA) fragments from various samples or contigs as input, computes damage patterns, clusters them, and outputs representative damage profiles per cluster, a probability of each sample pertaining to a cluster, as well as a Principal Component Analysis of the damage patterns for each sample for fast visualisation. We evaluated AdDeam on both simulated and empirical datasets. AdDeam effectively distinguishes different damage levels, such as uracil-DNA glycosylase-treated samples, sample-specific damages from specimens of different time periods, and can also distinguish between contigs containing modern or ancient fragments, providing a clear framework for aDNA authentication and facilitating large-scale analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: AdDeam is publicly available at https://github.com/LouisPwr/AdDeam and can also be installed via Bioconda. It is implemented in Python and C++. All analysis scripts and datasets are available at https://github.com/LouisPwr/AdDeamAnalysis and on Zenodo under: 10.5281/zenodo.15052427. Louis Kraft, Thorfinn Korneliussen, Peter Wad Sackett, Gabriel Renaud |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2022 | A simple guide to de novo transcriptome assembly and annotationabstractA transcriptome constructed from short-read RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is an easily attainable proxy catalog of protein-coding genes when genome assembly is unnecessary, expensive or difficult. In the absence of a sequenced genome to guide the reconstruction process, the transcriptome must be assembled de novo using only the information available in the RNA-seq reads. Subsequently, the sequences must be annotated in order to identify sequence-intrinsic and evolutionary features in them (for example, protein-coding regions). Although straightforward at first glance, de novo transcriptome assembly and annotation can quickly prove to be challenging undertakings. In addition to familiarizing themselves with the conceptual and technical intricacies of the tasks at hand and the numerous pre- and post-processing steps involved, those interested must also grapple with an overwhelmingly large choice of tools. The lack of standardized workflows, fast pace of development of new tools and techniques and paucity of authoritative literature have served to exacerbate the difficulty of the task even further. Here, we present a comprehensive overview of de novo transcriptome assembly and annotation. We discuss the procedures involved, including pre- and post-processing steps, and present a compendium of corresponding tools. Venket Raghavan, Louis Kraft, Fantin Mesny, Linda Rigerte |
Briefings Bioinform. | 2 |