Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John D. Woodward

dblp:317/5140 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 50% Biometric security · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
biometric privacy
0.011997
Biometrics: privacy's foe or privacy's friend? · Proc. IEEE 1997
Biometric security
biometric recognition
0.011997
Biometrics: privacy's foe or privacy's friend? · Proc. IEEE 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

legal and policy analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Prolog to: Biometrics: Privacy's Foe Or Privacy's Friend?
Weicheng Shen, Rajev Khanna, John D. Woodward
Proc. IEEE3
1997 Biometrics: privacy's foe or privacy's friend?
abstract
From the INS to ATM's, both the public and private sectors are making extensive use of biometrics for human recognition. As this technology becomes more economically viable and technically perfected, and thus more commonplace, the field of biometrics will spark legal and policy concerns. Critics inevitably compare biometrics to Big Brother and the loss of individual privacy. The probiometric lobby generally stresses the greater security and improved service that the technology provides. Is biometrics privacy's friend or privacy's foe? This paper explores the various arguments for and against biometrics and contends that while biometrics may pose legitimate privacy concerns, these issues can be adequately addressed. In the final analysis, biometrics emerges as privacy's friend.
John D. Woodward
Proc. IEEE1