Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qilong Cheng

dblp:318/0244 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2669-4253ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Haptics and multimodal interaction · 50% User interface design and tools · 50%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
User interface design and tools › prototyping
rapid prototyping
0.912025
VibraForge: A Scalable Prototyping Toolkit For Creating Spatialized Vibrotactile Feedback Systems · CHI 2025
Haptics and multimodal interaction › haptic feedback
vibrotactile feedback
0.912025
VibraForge: A Scalable Prototyping Toolkit For Creating Spatialized Vibrotactile Feedback Systems · CHI 2025
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor calibration
0.712023
Spatiotemporal Calibration of 3-D Millimetre-Wavelength Radar-Camera Pairs · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.712023
Spatiotemporal Calibration of 3-D Millimetre-Wavelength Radar-Camera Pairs · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › sensor calibration
spatio-temporal calibration
0.712023
Spatiotemporal Calibration of 3-D Millimetre-Wavelength Radar-Camera Pairs · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

toolkit design · 0.9identifiability analysis · 0.7ego-velocity estimation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 VibraForge: A Scalable Prototyping Toolkit For Creating Spatialized Vibrotactile Feedback Systems
Bingjian Huang, Siyi Ren, Yuewen Luo, Qilong Cheng, Hanfeng Cai, Yeqi Sang, Maurício Sousa, Paul H. Dietz, Daniel J. Wigdor
CHI4
2023 Spatiotemporal Calibration of 3-D Millimetre-Wavelength Radar-Camera Pairs
abstract
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) fuse data from multiple sensors and sensing modalities to impart a measure of robustness when operating in adverse conditions. Radars and cameras are popular choices for use in sensor fusion; although radar measurements are sparse in comparison to camera images, radar scans penetrate fog, rain, and snow. However, accurate sensor fusion depends upon knowledge of the spatial transform between the sensors and any temporal misalignment that exists in their measurement times. During the life cycle of an AV, these calibration parameters may change, so the ability to perform in-situ spatiotemporal calibration is essential to ensure reliable long-term operation. State-of-the-art 3D radar-camera spatiotemporal calibration algorithms require bespoke calibration targets that are not readily available in the field. In this paper, we describe an algorithm fortargetlessspatiotemporal calibration that does not require specialized infrastructure. Our approach leverages the ability of the radar unit to measure its own ego-velocity relative to a fixed, external reference frame. We analyze the identifiability of the spatiotemporal calibration problem and determine the motions necessary for calibration. Through a series of simulation studies, we characterize the sensitivity of our algorithm to measurement noise. Finally, we demonstrate accurate calibration for three real-world systems, including a handheld sensor rig and a vehicle-mounted sensor array. Our results show that we are able to match the performance of an existing, target-based method, while calibrating in arbitrary, infrastructure-free environments.
Emmett Wise, Qilong Cheng, Jonathan Kelly
IEEE Trans. Robotics2