Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matan Vetzler
dblp:318/1116
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 60% Language models and text generation · 40% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning › large language model security
Adversarial attack on LLM agents |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Effective Red-Teaming of Policy-Adherent Agents · EMNLP 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › intent detection
few-shot intent detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | QAID: Question Answering Inspired Few-shot Intent Detection · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
intent detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | QAID: Question Answering Inspired Few-shot Intent Detection · ICLR 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
jailbreak attack |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Effective Red-Teaming of Policy-Adherent Agents · EMNLP 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
persuasive strategies · 1.7multi-agent red-teaming · 1.7DAN prompts · 1.7few-shot learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Effective Red-Teaming of Policy-Adherent AgentsabstractTask-oriented LLM-based agents are increasingly used in domains with strict policies, such as refund eligibility or cancellation rules.The challenge lies in ensuring that the agent consistently adheres to these rules and policies, appropriately refusing any request that would violate them, while still maintaining a helpful and natural interaction.This calls for the development of tailored design and evaluation methodologies to ensure agent resilience against malicious user behavior.We propose a novel threat model that focuses on adversarial users aiming to exploit policy-adherent agents for personal benefit.To address this, we present CRAFT, a multi-agent red-teaming system that leverages policy-aware persuasive strategies to undermine a policy-adherent agent in a customerservice scenario, outperforming conventional jailbreak methods such as DAN prompts, emotional manipulation, and coercive.Building upon the existing τ -bench benchmark, we introduce τ -break, a complementary benchmark designed to rigorously assess the agent's robustness against manipulative user behavior.Finally, we evaluate several straightforward yet effective defense strategies.While these measures provide some protection, they fall short, highlighting the need for stronger, researchdriven safeguards to protect policy-adherent agents from adversarial attacks. 1 . Itay Nakash, George Kour, Koren Lazar, Matan Vetzler, Guy Uziel, Ateret Anaby-Tavor |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2023 | QAID: Question Answering Inspired Few-shot Intent Detection
Asaf Yehudai, Matan Vetzler, Yosi Mass, Koren Lazar, Doron Cohen 0001, Boaz Carmeli |
ICLR | 2 |