Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Deepthi Raghunandan
dblp:318/3161
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-8372-544XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics
sensemaking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Code Code Evolution: Understanding How People Change Data Science Notebooks Over Time · CHI 2023 |
Empirical software engineering › end-user programming
computational notebooks |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Code Code Evolution: Understanding How People Change Data Science Notebooks Over Time · CHI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regression model · 1.3mining software repositories · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Code Code Evolution: Understanding How People Change Data Science Notebooks Over TimeabstractSensemaking is the iterative process of identifying, extracting, and explaining insights from data, where each iteration is referred to as the “sensemaking loop.” However, little is known about how sensemaking behavior evolves from exploration and explanation during this process. This gap limits our ability to understand the full scope of sensemaking, which in turn inhibits the design of tools that support the process. We contribute the first mixed-method to characterize how sensemaking evolves within computational notebooks. We study 2,574 Jupyter notebooks mined from GitHub by identifying data science notebooks that have undergone significant iterations, presenting a regression model that automatically characterizes sensemaking activity, and using this regression model to calculate and analyze shifts in activity across GitHub versions. Our results show that notebook authors participate in various sensemaking tasks over time, such as annotation, branching analysis, and documentation. We use our insights to recommend extensions to current notebook environments. Deepthi Raghunandan, Aayushi Roy, Shenzhi Shi, Niklas Elmqvist, Leilani Battle |
CHI | 1 |
| 2023 | How I Met Your Data Science Team: A Tale of Effective CommunicationabstractDeriving actionable insights from data requires expertise in both data science as well as the specific application domain. This need for domain-specific knowledge often necessitates engaging an interdisciplinary team rather than an individual for most realistic data science problems in domains such as finance, biology, or drug discovery. This, in turn, requires effective collaboration between team members. This paper seeks to understand common themes in how such multi-disciplinary teams communicate to accomplish their analytical goals. We conduct an interview study with 15 professional data scientists working in small to large organizations in fields ranging from bioinformatics to accounting. Communication between individuals in these teams depends on their team structure and expertise. Data scientists specifically adapt their tools to communicate with team members with different types of domain knowledge. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches for supporting communication in multi-disciplinary environments. Aayushi Roy, Deepthi Raghunandan, Niklas Elmqvist, Leilani Battle |
VL/HCC | 2 |