Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anna Gautier

dblp:318/7547 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7252-8133ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
risk-taking behavior
0.912025
Take a Chance on Me: How Robot Performance and Risk Behaviour Affects Trust and Risk-Taking · HRI 2025
Human-robot interaction
trust in robots
0.912025
Take a Chance on Me: How Robot Performance and Risk Behaviour Affects Trust and Risk-Taking · HRI 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
task planning
0.812024
Robust MITL planning under uncertain navigation times · ICRA 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › task planning
temporal logic task planning
0.812024
Robust MITL planning under uncertain navigation times · ICRA 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
auction design
0.712023
Multi-Unit Auctions for Allocating Chance-Constrained Resources · AAAI 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › auction design
multi-unit auction
0.712023
Multi-Unit Auctions for Allocating Chance-Constrained Resources · AAAI 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
resource allocation
0.712023
Multi-Unit Auctions for Allocating Chance-Constrained Resources · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.9receding horizon planning · 0.8mixed-integer linear programming · 0.8markov decision process · 0.8multi-objective reasoning · 0.7chance constraints · 0.7bidding algorithm · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Take a Chance on Me: How Robot Performance and Risk Behaviour Affects Trust and Risk-Taking
abstract
Real-world human-robot interactions often encompass uncertainty. This uncertainty can be handled in different ways, for example by designing robot planners to be more or less risk-tolerant. However, how users actually perceive different risk-taking behaviours in robots has yet to be described. Additionally, in the absence of guarantees on optimal robot performance, the interaction between risk and performance on user perceptions is also unclear. To address this gap, we conducted a user study with 84 participants investigating how robot performance and risk behaviour affects users' trust and risk-taking decisions. Participants collaborated with a Franka robot arm to perform a block-stacking task. We compared a robot which displays consistent but sub-optimal behaviours to a robot displaying risky but occasionally optimal behaviour. Risky robot behaviour led to higher trust than consistent behaviour when the robot was on average good at stacking blocks (high expectation), but lower trust when the robot was on average bad at stacking blocks (low expectation). Individual risk-willingness also predicted likelihood of selecting the risky robot over the consistent robot for future interactions, but only when the average expectation was low. These findings have implications for risk-aware planning and decision-making in mixed human-robot systems.
Rebecca Stower, Anna Gautier, Maciej Wozniak 0001, Patric Jensfelt, Jana Tumova, Iolanda Leite
HRI2
2024 Robust MITL planning under uncertain navigation times
abstract
In environments like offices, the duration of a robot’s navigation between two locations may vary over time. For instance, reaching a kitchen may take more time during lunchtime since the corridors are crowded with people heading the same way. In this work, we address the problem of routing in such environments with tasks expressed in Metric Interval Temporal Logic (MITL) – a rich robot task specification language that allows us to capture explicit time requirements. Our objective is to find a strategy that maximizes the temporal robustness of the robot’s MITL task. As the first step towards a solution, we define a Mixed-integer linear programming approach to solving the task planning problem over a Varying Weighted Transition System, where navigation durations are deterministic but vary depending on the time of day. Then, we apply this planner to optimize for MITL temporal robustness in Markov Decision Processes, where the navigation durations between physical locations are uncertain, but the time-dependent distribution over possible delays is known. Finally, we develop a receding horizon planner for Markov Decision Processes that preserves guarantees over MITL temporal robustness. We show the scalability of our planning algorithms in simulations of robotic tasks.
Alexis Linard, Anna Gautier, Daniel Duberg, Jana Tumova
ICRA2
2023 Multi-Unit Auctions for Allocating Chance-Constrained Resources
abstract
Sharing scarce resources is a key challenge in multi-agent interaction, especially when individual agents are uncertain about their future consumption. We present a new auction mechanism for preallocating multi-unit resources among agents, while limiting the chance of resource violations. By planning for a chance constraint, we strike a balance between worst-case approaches, which under-utilise resources, and expected-case approaches, which lack formal guarantees. We also present an algorithm that allows agents to generate bids via multi-objective reasoning, which are then submitted to the auction. We then discuss how the auction can be extended to non-cooperative scenarios. Finally, we demonstrate empirically that our auction outperforms state-of-the-art techniques for chance-constrained multi-agent resource allocation in complex settings with up to hundreds of agents.
Anna Gautier, Bruno Lacerda, Nick Hawes, Michael J. Wooldridge
AAAI1