Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

N'Deye Diakhate

dblp:319/3363 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Design research and methods · 77% Collaborative and social computing · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Design research and methods
speculative design
0.612022
Radical Futures: Supporting Community-Led Design Engagements through an Afrofuturist Speculative Design Toolkit · CHI 2022
Collaborative and social computing › vulnerable populations
marginalized communities
0.212022
Radical Futures: Supporting Community-Led Design Engagements through an Afrofuturist Speculative Design Toolkit · CHI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

toolkit evaluation · 0.6interviews · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Radical Futures: Supporting Community-Led Design Engagements through an Afrofuturist Speculative Design Toolkit
abstract
When considering the democratic intentions of co-design, designers and design researchers must evaluate the impact of power imbalances embedded in common design and research dynamics. This holds particularly true in work with and for marginalized communities, who are frequently excluded in design processes. To address this issue, we examine how existing design tools and methods are used to support communities in processes of community building or reimagining, considering the influence of race and identity. This paper describes our findings from 27 interviews with community design practitioners conducted to evaluate the Building Utopia toolkit, which employs an Afrofuturist lens for speculative design processes. Our research findings support the importance of design tools that prompt conversations on race in design, and tensions between the desire for imaginative design practice and the immediacy of social issues, particularly when designing with Black and brown communities.
Kirsten Bray, Christina N. Harrington, Andrea G. Parker, N'Deye Diakhate, Jennifer Roberts
CHI4