Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ryan David Bowler

dblp:319/3785 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 77% Design research and methods · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
temporality
0.612022
Exploring Uncertainty in Digital Scheduling, and The Wider Implications of Unrepresented Temporalities in HCI · CHI 2022
Design research and methods
speculative design
0.212022
Exploring Uncertainty in Digital Scheduling, and The Wider Implications of Unrepresented Temporalities in HCI · CHI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative study · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Exploring Uncertainty in Digital Scheduling, and The Wider Implications of Unrepresented Temporalities in HCI
abstract
Digital calendars and other technologies for social event planning leave little space to communicate uncertainty regarding time, place or the ability to attend an event. However, narratives of certainty can be detrimental and lead to the marginalisation of those who find it hard to cope with rigid and strictly paced schedules, such as people with health conditions or caring responsibilities. In this paper, we explore uncertainty as the starting point and leading principle behind digital scheduling tools. We present Haze, a speculative tool and user interface, designed to gain insights on participants’ perceptions of uncertainty-based scheduling scenarios. We report on two qualitative studies (total of 21 participants), which indicate that a change in perspective towards uncertainty can challenge moral assumptions around certainty, increase temporal empathy, and indeed support those who are particularly affected by uncertainty. These findings help shift and expand the repertoire of temporality and discuss moral and social responsibilities for design and HCI.
Ryan David Bowler, Benjamin Bach, Larissa Pschetz
CHI1