Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jolee Finch

dblp:319/3867 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces · 87% Design research and methods · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Personal fabrication and tangible interfaces › tangible interaction
grasp interaction
0.612022
Mold-It: Understanding how Physical Shapes affect Interaction with Handheld Freeform Devices · CHI 2022
Design research and methods › HCI theory
affordance
0.212022
Mold-It: Understanding how Physical Shapes affect Interaction with Handheld Freeform Devices · CHI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

think-aloud design sessions · 0.6thematic analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Mold-It: Understanding how Physical Shapes affect Interaction with Handheld Freeform Devices
abstract
Advanced technologies are increasingly enabling the creation of interactive devices with non-rectangular form-factors but it is currently unclear what alternative form-factors are desirable for end-users. We contribute an understanding of the interplay between the rationale for the form factors of such devices and their interactive content through think-aloud design sessions in which participants could mold devices as they wished using clay. We analysed their qualitative reflections on how the shapes affected interaction. Using thematic analysis, we identified shape features desirable on handheld freeform devices and discuss the particularity of three themes central to the choice of form factors: freeform dexterity, shape features discoverability and shape adaptability (to the task and context). In a second study following the same experimental set-up, we focused on the trade off between dexterity and discoverability and the relation to the concept of affordance. Our work reveals the shape features that impact the most the choice of grasps on freeform devices from which we derive design guidelines for the design of such devices.
Marcos Serrano, Jolee Finch, Pourang Irani, Andrés Lucero, Anne Roudaut
CHI2