Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wookje Han

dblp:319/4219 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
long-form question answering
0.712023
PreWoMe: Exploiting Presuppositions as Working Memory for Long Form Question Answering · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › natural language semantics › semantic interpretation
presupposition
0.712023
PreWoMe: Exploiting Presuppositions as Working Memory for Long Form Question Answering · EMNLP 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

working memory · 0.7feedback and action generation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 PreWoMe: Exploiting Presuppositions as Working Memory for Long Form Question Answering
abstract
Information-seeking questions in long-form question answering (LFQA) often prove misleading due to ambiguity or false presupposition in the question.While many existing approaches handle misleading questions, they are tailored to limited questions, which are insufficient in a real-world setting with unpredictable input characteristics.In this work, we propose PreWoMe, a unified approach capable of handling any type of information-seeking question.The key idea of PreWoMe involves extracting presuppositions in the question and exploiting them as working memory to generate feedback and action about the question.Our experiment shows that PreWoMe is effective not only in tackling misleading questions but also in handling normal ones, thereby demonstrating the effectiveness of leveraging presuppositions, feedback, and action for real-world QA settings.
Wookje Han, Jinsol Park, Kyungjae Lee 0002
EMNLP1