Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Frederico Aleixo
dblp:319/5279
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
model refinement |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Revising Boolean Logical Models of Biological Regulatory Networks · KR 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Revising Boolean Logical Models of Biological Regulatory Networks · KR 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Revising Boolean Logical Models of Biological Regulatory Networks · KR 2023 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Revising Boolean Logical Models of Biological Regulatory NetworksabstractBoolean regulatory networks are used to represent complex biological processes, modelling the interactions of biological compounds, such as proteins or genes, with each other and with other substances in a cell. Creating and maintaining computational models of these networks is crucial for comprehending corresponding cellular processes, as they allow reproducing known behaviours and testing new hypotheses and predictions in silico. In this context, model revision focuses on validating and (if necessary) repairing existing models based on new experimental data. However, model revision is commonly performed manually, which is inefficient and prone to error, and the few existing automated solutions either only apply to simpler networks or are limited in their revision process, since they may not be able to produce a solution within a reasonable time frame or miss the optimal solution. In this paper, we develop a solution for revising logical models of Boolean regulatory networks, able to find repairs that are consistent with provided, possibly incomplete experimental data, and minimal w.r.t. the differences to the original network. We show that our solution can be used to revise different real-world Boolean logical models very efficiently, surpassing a previous solution in terms of solved instances and with a considerable margin w.r.t. processing time. Frederico Aleixo, Matthias Knorr 0001, João Leite 0001 |
KR | 1 |