Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alessandro Toigo

dblp:32/10453 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 33% Deep learning architectures and training · 33% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation
0.112010
Spectral Regularization for Support Estimation · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
spectral regularization
0.112010
Spectral Regularization for Support Estimation · NIPS 2010
Machine learning › Learning theory › distribution learning
support estimation
0.112010
Spectral Regularization for Support Estimation · NIPS 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spectral estimator · 0.1reproducing kernel hilbert space · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Spectral Regularization for Support Estimation
abstract
In this paper we consider the problem of learning from data the support of a probability distribution when the distribution {\em does not} have a density (with respect to some reference measure). We propose a new class of regularized spectral estimators based on a new notion of reproducing kernel Hilbert space, which we call {\em ``completely regular''}. Completely regular kernels allow to capture the relevant geometric and topological properties of an arbitrary probability space. In particular, they are the key ingredient to prove the universal consistency of the spectral estimators and in this respect they are the analogue of universal kernels for supervised problems. Numerical experiments show that spectral estimators compare favorably to state of the art machine learning algorithms for density support estimation.
Ernesto De Vito, Lorenzo Rosasco, Alessandro Toigo
NIPS3