Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert A. Morris 0001

dblp:32/2472-1 · also Robert Morris 0004 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
20ranked-venue papers
14as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-4762-4817ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 17 · 12 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 4 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Mathematical optimization · 69% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 17% Computational complexity · 14%
Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 73% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 27%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
local search
0.112008
Local Search for Optimal Global Map Generation Using Mid-Decadal Landsat Images · AAAI 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
temporal reasoning
0.132003
Temporal Constraint Reasoning With Preferences · IJCAI 2001
On the complexity of reasoning about repeating events · KR 2000
Tractable Pareto Optimization of Temporal Preferences · IJCAI 2003
Environmental and earth informatics
remote sensing
0.022008
Learning to Improve Earth Observation Flight Planning · AAAI 2008
Local Search for Optimal Global Map Generation Using Mid-Decadal Landsat Images · AAAI 2008
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization
0.012003
Tractable Pareto Optimization of Temporal Preferences · IJCAI 2003
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization
pareto optimization
0.012003
Tractable Pareto Optimization of Temporal Preferences · IJCAI 2003
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › decision theory
temporal preferences
0.012003
Tractable Pareto Optimization of Temporal Preferences · IJCAI 2003
Computational complexity › complexity of reasoning
temporal reasoning complexity
0.012000
On the complexity of reasoning about repeating events · KR 2000
Environmental and earth informatics › remote sensing
satellite imagery analysis
0.012008
Local Search for Optimal Global Map Generation Using Mid-Decadal Landsat Images · AAAI 2008
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
scheduling
0.011997
Automatic Generation of Heuristics for Scheduling · IJCAI 1997
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint propagation
interval constraint propagation
0.011993
Path Consistency in a Network of Non-Convex Intervals · IJCAI 1993
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
spatio-temporal reasoning
0.011993
Path Consistency in a Network of Non-Convex Intervals · IJCAI 1993
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › temporal reasoning
temporal constraints
0.012001
Temporal Constraint Reasoning With Preferences · IJCAI 2001
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search
0.011997
Automatic Generation of Heuristics for Scheduling · IJCAI 1997
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction
0.011993
Path Consistency in a Network of Non-Convex Intervals · IJCAI 1993
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction › constraint propagation
path consistency
0.011993
Path Consistency in a Network of Non-Convex Intervals · IJCAI 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulated annealing · 0.2reinforcement learning · 0.2machine learning · 0.2local search · 0.2pareto optimization · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Designing Noise-Minimal Rotorcraft Approach Trajectories
abstract
NASA and the international aviation community are investing in the development of a commercial transportation infrastructure that includes the increased use of rotorcraft, specifically helicopters and civil tilt rotors. However, there is significant concern over the impact of noise on the communities surrounding the transportation facilities. One way to address the rotorcraft noise problem is by exploiting powerful search techniques coming from artificial intelligence to design low-noise flight profiles that can be then validated though field tests. This article investigates the use of discrete heuristic search methods to design low-noise approach trajectories for rotorcraft. Our work builds on a long research tradition in trajectory optimization using either numerical methods or discrete search. Novel features of our approach include the use of a discrete search space with a resolution that can be varied, and the coupling of search with a robust simulator to evaluate candidates. The article includes a systematic comparison of different search techniques; in particular, in the experiments, we are able to do a trade study that compares complete search algorithms such as A * with faster but approximate methods such as local search.
Robert A. Morris 0001, Matt Johnson 0001, K. Brent Venable, James Lindsey
ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol.1
2012 Local Search for Designing Noise-Minimal Rotorcraft Approach Trajectories
Robert A. Morris 0001, K. Brent Venable, Marco Pegoraro 0001, James Lindsay
IAAI1
2008 Local Search for Optimal Global Map Generation Using Mid-Decadal Landsat Images
Robert A. Morris 0001, John Gasch, Lina Khatib, Steven Covington
AAAI1
2008 Learning to Improve Earth Observation Flight Planning
Robert A. Morris 0001, Nikunj C. Oza, Leslie Keely, Elif Kürklü, Anthony Strawa
AAAI1
2005 Coordinated science campaign scheduling for sensor webs
abstract
In the past decade, the number of Earth observation satellites has burgeoned. Present and future Earth observing missions will continue to study different aspects and interacting pieces of Earth's hydrosphere, lithosphere, atmosphere and biosphere. Scientists are designing increasingly complex, interdisciplinary campaigns to exploit the diverse capabilities of multiple Earth sensing assets. Currently, the scheduling of scientific observations for satellites in low Earth orbit is conducted independently by every mission operations center. There is a lack of information infrastructure to enable the scheduling of coordinated observations involving multiple sensors. This paper proposes a software architecture and describes a prototype system called DESOPS (Distributed Earth Science Observation Planning and Scheduling) to address this deficiency.
Robert A. Morris 0001, Jennifer L. Dungan, Will Edgington, Jenny Weisenberg Williams, Jean Carlson, Christopher Bruno, Terri Wood
IGARSS1
2004 Strategies for Global Optimization of Temporal Preferences
Paul H. Morris, Robert A. Morris 0001, Lina Khatib, Sailesh Ramakrishnan, Andrew Bachmann
CP2
2003 Tractable Pareto Optimization of Temporal Preferences
Lina Khatib, Paul H. Morris, Robert A. Morris 0001, K. Brent Venable
IJCAI3
2002 Learning and Solving Soft Temporal Constraints: An Experimental Study
Francesca Rossi 0001, Alessandro Sperduti, K. Brent Venable, Lina Khatib, Paul H. Morris, Robert A. Morris 0001
CP6
2001 Temporal Constraint Reasoning With Preferences
Lina Khatib, Paul H. Morris, Robert A. Morris 0001, Francesca Rossi 0001
IJCAI3
2001 Learning preferences on temporal constraints: a preliminary report
abstract
A number of reasoning problems involving the manipulation of temporal information can naturally be viewed as implicitly inducing an ordering of potential local decisions involving time (specifically, associated with durations or orderings of events) on the basis of preferences. For example, a pair of events might be constrained to occur in a certain order and, in addition, it might be preferable that the delay between the start times of each of them be as large, or as small, as possible. Sometimes, however, it is more natural to view preferences as something initially ascribed to complete solutions to temporal reasoning problems, rather than to local decisions. For example, in classical scheduling problems, the preference for solutions which minimize makespan is a global, rather than a local, condition. In such cases, it might be useful to learn the local preferences that contribute to globally preferred solutions. This information could be used in heuristics to guide the solver to more promising solutions. To address the potential requirement for information about local preferences, we propose to apply learning techniques to infer local preferences from global ones. The preliminary work proposes an approach based on the notion of learning a set of soft temporal constraints, given a training set of solutions to a Temporal CSP, and an objective function for evaluating each solution in the set.
Francesca Rossi 0001, Alessandro Sperduti, Lina Khatib, Paul H. Morris, Robert A. Morris 0001
TIME5
2000 On the complexity of reasoning about repeating events
Robert A. Morris 0001, Paul H. Morris
KR1
2000 Introduction to the Special issue on Time and Temporal Reasoning
Robert A. Morris 0001, Lina Khatib
Comput. Intell.1
2000 Constraint Reasoning about Repeating Events: Satisfaction and Optimization
abstract
Effective manipulation of temporal information about periodic events is required for solving complex problems such as long‐range scheduling or querying temporal information. Furthermore, many problems involving repeating events involve the optimization of temporal aspects of these events (e.g., minimizing make‐span in job‐shop scheduling). In this paper, a constraint‐based formulation of reasoning problems with repeating events is presented, and its complexity is analyzed for a range of problems. Optimization constraints are interpreted formally using the Semiring CSPs (SCSP) representation of optimization in constraint reasoning. This allows for familiar algorithms such as branch‐and‐bound to be applied to solving them.
Robert A. Morris 0001, Lina Khatib
Comput. Intell.1
1999 Introduction to the special issue on time and temporal reasoning
Robert A. Morris 0001, Lina Khatib
J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell.1
1997 Automatic Generation of Heuristics for Scheduling
Robert A. Morris 0001, John L. Bresina, Stuart M. Rodgers
IJCAI1
1996 Domain-Independent Temporal Reasoning with Recurring Events
abstract
Numerous examples of temporal reasoning involve a process of abstraction from the number of times an event is to occur or the number of times events stand in a temporal relation. For example, scheduling a recurring event such as one's office hours may consider things like the relative temporal ordering of the office hours and a number of other events in a given work day. The number of times office hours will actually be held may be unknown, even irrelevant, at the time of scheduling them. The objective of this article is to formulate a domain‐independent framework for reasoning about recurring events and their relations. To achieve this end, we propose an ontology of recurrence based on the model‐theoretic structure underlying collective predication using plural noun phrases. We offer a calculus of binary temporal relations for temporal collections based on a well‐defined transformation of interval temporal relations into recurrence relations. Finally, we describe a reasoning framework based on manipulating knowledge stored in temporal relation networks, which is in turn a specialization of the CSP (constraint satisfaction problem) framework. The reasoner manipulates recurrence relations in the network to determine the network's consistency or to generate scenarios.
Robert A. Morris 0001, William D. Shoaff, Lina Khatib
Comput. Intell.1
1996 Model-based, real-time control of electrical power systems
abstract
Automated control of a large electrical power distribution network through a single controller can provide advantages in efficiency and reliability as well as reduction in maintenance costs. For control to be most effective, it is necessary that a global view of the entire network be had by the controller, so that it can reason as to the cause of the readings of the various sensing devices located throughout the network, Traditional approaches to power system control have involved a set of local devices (i.e., protective relays) that base their decision on the instantaneous reading of a single sensor. These single-parameter decisions can sometimes be incorrect due to sensor failures. Furthermore, a special type of fault called a soft fault, where a fault impedance limits the current to a value below the relay operating point, are nearly impossible to detect with decisions based on a single local parameter. By reasoning over an entire suit of sensing devices spread throughout the entire network, protection decisions based on a global view can become more reliable as well as comprehensive. Some previous approaches have implemented global control with varying degrees of success through the use of rule-based knowledge-based systems. This paper describes an alternative knowledge-based approach that makes use of so-called models of structure-and-behavior, to which model-based diagnosis is applied. The objective of this approach is to develop a system that can reliably diagnose faults in power distribution networks (especially soft faults), identify sensor failures, and carry out appropriate corrective action automatically. An intelligent power controller (IPC) which has these capabilities is described. This IPC was rigorously tested in an DC electrical power distribution system testbed and found to successfully carry out the required functions. This paper also describes in detail the tests and the conclusions drawn from their results.
Avelino J. Gonzalez, Robert A. Morris 0001, Frederic D. McKenzie, Daniel J. Carreira, Brian K. Gann
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A2
1993 Path Consistency in a Network of Non-Convex Intervals
Robert A. Morris 0001, William D. Shoaff, Lina Khatib
IJCAI1
1993 Reasoning agents in a dynamic world: The frame problem, edited by Kenneth M. Ford and Patrick J. Hayes. JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut 1991
Robert A. Morris 0001
Int. J. Intell. Syst.1
1991 An interval-based temporal relational calculus for events with gaps
abstract
Traditional interval-based representations of time assume interval convexity, i.e., that intervals are uninterrupted. This assumption makes it difficult to represent the common sense notion of a single event with ‘gaps’. Having a representation of this species of event contributes favorably to the ability of the human or machine to solve certain tasks, such as planning or database retrieval. This paper defines two kinds of discourse and knowledge object which comprise collections of convex intervals. Although other researchers have suggested the need for a relaxation of the assumption of convexity in event representation, there has been no attempt to offer a concise representation of gapped events. The formulation employed here to introduce gapped events is an extension of James Allen's interval-based approach to time representation. Allen's calculus of thirteen binary relations defined between two convex intervals is generalized to a matrix of binary relations between each pair of subintervals of pairs of non-convex intervals. A primary goal of this paper is to show that this extension of the interval-based approach increases the expressive power of the calculus, while retaining its computational advantages.
Robert A. Morris 0001, Lina Khatib
J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell.1