Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mark Ulrich

dblp:32/9575 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 91% Graph data management · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
graph-based recommendation
0.312018
Pixie: A System for Recommending 3+ Billion Items to 200+ Million Users in Real-Time · WWW 2018
Recommender systems › graph-based recommendation
random walk recommendation
0.312018
Pixie: A System for Recommending 3+ Billion Items to 200+ Million Users in Real-Time · WWW 2018
Recommender systems › online recommendation
real-time recommendation
0.312018
Pixie: A System for Recommending 3+ Billion Items to 200+ Million Users in Real-Time · WWW 2018
Graph data management › graph algorithms
graph traversal
0.112018
Pixie: A System for Recommending 3+ Billion Items to 200+ Million Users in Real-Time · WWW 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random walk · 0.3graph pruning · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Pixie: A System for Recommending 3+ Billion Items to 200+ Million Users in Real-Time
abstract
User experience in modern content discovery applications critically depends on high-quality personalized recommendations. However, building systems that provide such recommendations presents a major challenge due to a massive pool of items, a large number of users, and requirements for recommendations to be responsive to user actions and generated on demand in real-time. Here we present Pixie, a scalable graph-based real-time recommender system that we developed and deployed at Pinterest. Given a set of user-specific pins as a query, Pixie selects in real-time from billions of possible pins those that are most related to the query. To generate recommendations, we develop Pixie Random Walk algorithm that utilizes the Pinterest object graph of 3 billion nodes and 17 billion edges. Experiments show that recommendations provided by Pixie lead up to 50% higher user engagement when compared to the previous Hadoop-based production system. Furthermore, we develop a graph pruning strategy at that leads to an additional 58% improvement in recommendations. Last, we discuss system aspects of Pixie, where a single server executes 1,200 recommendation requests per second with 60 millisecond latency. Today, systems backed by Pixie contribute to more than 80% of all user engagement on Pinterest.
Pong Eksombatchai, Pranav Jindal, Zitao Liu 0001, Rahul Sharma 0001, Charles Sugnet, Mark Ulrich, Jure Leskovec
WWW7