Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Akash Godbole

dblp:320/7632 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0000-3890-5591ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Biometric security · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Biometric security
biometric recognition
0.812024
Mobile Contactless Palmprint Recognition: Use of Multiscale, Multimodel Embeddings · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024
Biometric security › palmprint recognition
contactless palmprint recognition
0.812024
Mobile Contactless Palmprint Recognition: Use of Multiscale, Multimodel Embeddings · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024
Biometric security
palmprint recognition
0.812024
Mobile Contactless Palmprint Recognition: Use of Multiscale, Multimodel Embeddings · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision transformer · 0.8dimensionality reduction · 0.8convolutional neural network · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Mobile Contactless Palmprint Recognition: Use of Multiscale, Multimodel Embeddings
abstract
Contactless palmprints are comprised of both global and local discriminative features. Most prior work focuses on extracting global features or local features alone for palmprint matching, whereas this research introduces a novel framework that combines global and local features for enhanced palmprint matching accuracy. Leveraging recent advancements in deep learning, this study integrates a vision transformer (ViT) and a convolutional neural network (CNN) to extract complementary local and global features. Next, a mobile-based, end-to-end palmprint recognition system is developed, referred to as Palm-ID. On top of the ViT and CNN features, Palm-ID incorporates a palmprint enhancement module and efficient dimensionality reduction (for faster matching). Palm-ID balances the trade-off between accuracy and latency, requiring just 18ms to extract a template of size 516 bytes, which can be efficiently searched against a 10,000 palmprint gallery in 0.33ms on an AMD EPYC 7543 32-Core CPU utilizing 128-threads. Cross-database matching protocols and evaluations on large-scale operational datasets demonstrate the robustness of the proposed method, achieving a TAR of 98.06% at FAR=0.01% on a newly collected, time-separated dataset. To show a practical deployment of the end-to-end system, the entire recognition pipeline is embedded within a mobile device for enhanced user privacy and security.
Steven A. Grosz, Akash Godbole, Anil K. Jain 0001
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.2
2022 On Demographic Bias in Fingerprint Recognition
abstract
Fingerprint recognition systems have been deployed globally in numerous applications including personal devices, forensics, law enforcement, banking, and national identity systems. For these systems to be socially acceptable and trustworthy, it is critical that they perform equally well across different demographic groups. In this work, we propose a formal statistical framework to test for the existence of bias (demographic differentials) in fingerprint recognition across four major demographic groups (white male, white female, black male, and black female) for two state-of-the-art (SOTA) fingerprint matchers operating in verification and identification modes. Experiments on two different fingerprint databases (with 15,468 and 1,014 subjects) show that demographic differentials in SOTA fingerprint recognition systems decrease as the matcher accuracy increases and any small bias that may be evident is likely due to certain outlier, low-quality fingerprint images.
Akash Godbole, Steven A. Grosz, Karthik Nandakumar, Anil K. Jain 0001
IJCB1