Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ron Eliav

dblp:321/0820 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 66% Question answering and dialogue systems · 15% Information extraction and text analysis · 15%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › logic-based explanation
abductive explanation
0.912025
Explain Yourself, Briefly! Self-Explaining Neural Networks with Concise Sufficient Reasons · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Explain Yourself, Briefly! Self-Explaining Neural Networks with Concise Sufficient Reasons · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
self-explaining neural networks
0.912025
Explain Yourself, Briefly! Self-Explaining Neural Networks with Concise Sufficient Reasons · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.612022
QASem Parsing: Text-to-text Modeling of QA-based Semantics · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
sequence-to-sequence generation
0.212022
QASem Parsing: Text-to-text Modeling of QA-based Semantics · EMNLP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised training · 0.9sequence-to-sequence language model · 0.6multi-task learning · 0.6data augmentation · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Explain Yourself, Briefly! Self-Explaining Neural Networks with Concise Sufficient Reasons
abstract
*Minimal sufficient reasons* represent a prevalent form of explanation - the smallest subset of input features which, when held constant at their corresponding values, ensure that the prediction remains unchanged. Previous *post-hoc* methods attempt to obtain such explanations but face two main limitations: (1) Obtaining these subsets poses a computational challenge, leading most scalable methods to converge towards suboptimal, less meaningful subsets; (2) These methods heavily rely on sampling out-of-distribution input assignments, potentially resulting in counterintuitive behaviors. To tackle these limitations, we propose in this work a self-supervised training approach, which we term *sufficient subset training* (SST). Using SST, we train models to generate concise sufficient reasons for their predictions as an integral part of their output. Our results indicate that our framework produces succinct and faithful subsets substantially more efficiently than competing post-hoc methods while maintaining comparable predictive performance.
Shahaf Bassan, Ron Eliav, Shlomit Gur
ICLR2
2023 Semantic uncertainty guides the extension of conventions to new referents
Ron Eliav, Anya Ji, Yoav Artzi, Robert D. Hawkins
CogSci1
2022 QASem Parsing: Text-to-text Modeling of QA-based Semantics
abstract
Various works suggest the appeal of incorporating explicit semantic representations when addressing challenging realistic NLP scenarios.Common approaches offer either comprehensive linguistically-based formalisms, like AMR, or alternatively Open-IE, which provides a shallow and partial representation.More recently, an appealing trend introduces semi-structured natural-language structures as an intermediate meaning-capturing representation, often in the form of questions and answers.In this work, we further promote this line of research by considering three prior QA-based semantic representations.These cover verbal, nominalized and discourse-based predications, regarded here as jointly providing a comprehensive representation of textual informationtermed QASem.To facilitate this perspective, we investigate how to best utilize pre-trained sequence-to-sequence language models, which seem particularly promising for generating representations that consist of natural language expressions (questions and answers).In particular, we examine and analyze input and output linearization strategies, as well as data augmentation and multitask learning for a scarce training data setup.Consequently, we release the first unified QASem parsing tool, easily applicable for downstream tasks that can benefit from an explicit semi-structured account of information units in text.
Ayal Klein, Eran Hirsch, Ron Eliav, Valentina Pyatkin, Avi Caciularu, Ido Dagan
EMNLP3