Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kerui Zhu
dblp:321/0999
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Language models and text generation · 32% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 32% Information extraction and text analysis · 28% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation › knowledge-grounded generation
commonsense generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DimonGen: Diversified Generative Commonsense Reasoning for Explaining Concept Relationships · ACL (1) 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DimonGen: Diversified Generative Commonsense Reasoning for Explaining Concept Relationships · ACL (1) 2023 |
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph explanation
entity relationship explanation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | DEER: Descriptive Knowledge Graph for Explaining Entity Relationships · EMNLP 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › autoregressive model
transformer-based generation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | DEER: Descriptive Knowledge Graph for Explaining Entity Relationships · EMNLP 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 1.1self-supervised learning · 1.1dependency parsing · 1.1mixture of retrievers · 0.7mixture of generators · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | DimonGen: Diversified Generative Commonsense Reasoning for Explaining Concept RelationshipsabstractIn this paper, we propose DimonGen, which aims to generate diverse sentences describing concept relationships in various everyday scenarios.To support this, we first create a benchmark dataset for this task by adapting the existing CommonGen dataset.We then propose a two-stage model called MoREE to generate the target sentences.MoREE consists of a mixture of retrievers model that retrieves diverse context sentences related to the given concepts, and a mixture of generators model that generates diverse sentences based on the retrieved contexts.We conduct experiments on the DimonGen task and show that MoREE outperforms strong baselines in terms of both the quality and diversity of the generated sentences.Our results demonstrate that MoREE is able to generate diverse sentences that reflect different relationships between concepts, leading to a comprehensive understanding of concept relationships. 1 Chenzhengyi Liu, Jie Huang 0009, Kerui Zhu, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2022 | DEER: Descriptive Knowledge Graph for Explaining Entity RelationshipsabstractWe propose DEER (Descriptive Knowledge Graph for Explaining Entity Relationships)an open and informative form of modeling entity relationships.In DEER, relationships between entities are represented by free-text relation descriptions.For instance, the relationship between entities of machine learning and algorithm can be represented as "Machine learning explores the study and construction of algorithms that can learn from and make predictions on data."To construct DEER, we propose a self-supervised learning method to extract relation descriptions with the analysis of dependency patterns and generate relation descriptions with a transformer-based relation description synthesizing model, where no human labeling is required.Experiments demonstrate that our system can extract and generate highquality relation descriptions for explaining entity relationships.The results suggest that we can build an open and informative knowledge graph without human annotation. Jie Huang 0009, Kerui Zhu, Kevin Chen-Chuan Chang, Jinjun Xiong, Wen-Mei W. Hwu |
EMNLP | 2 |