Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andreas Gittis
dblp:322/1058
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 50% Logic in computer science · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking › synthesis
program synthesis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Randomized Synthesis for Diversity and Cost Constraints with Control Improvisation · CAV (2) 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot planning |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Randomized Synthesis for Diversity and Cost Constraints with Control Improvisation · CAV (2) 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
constraint solving · 1.1automata-based synthesis · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Randomized Synthesis for Diversity and Cost Constraints with Control ImprovisationabstractAbstract In many synthesis problems, it can be essential to generate implementations which not only satisfy functional constraints but are also randomized to improve variety, robustness, or unpredictability. The recently-proposed framework of control improvisation (CI) provides techniques for the correct-by-construction synthesis of randomized systems subject to hard and soft constraints. However, prior work on CI has focused on qualitative specifications, whereas in robotic planning and other areas we often have quantitative quality metrics which can be traded against each other. For example, a designer of a patrolling security robot might want to know by how much the average patrol time needs to be increased in order to ensure that a particular aspect of the robot’s route is sufficiently diverse and hence unpredictable. In this paper, we enable this type of application by generalizing the CI problem to support quantitative soft constraints which bound the expected value of a given cost function, and randomness constraints which enforce diversity of the generated traces with respect to a given label function. We establish the basic theory of labelled quantitative CI problems, and develop efficient algorithms for solving them when the specifications are encoded by finite automata. We also provide an approximate improvisation algorithm based on constraint solving for any specifications encodable as Boolean formulas. We demonstrate the utility of our problem formulation and algorithms with experiments applying them to generate diverse near-optimal plans for robotic planning problems. Andreas Gittis, Eric Vin, Daniel J. Fremont |
CAV (2) | 1 |