Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aalia Habib
dblp:322/1092
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 50% Geometric modeling and processing · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 77% Information extraction and text analysis · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape analysis
3d shape understanding |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Neurally-Guided Shape Parser: Grammar-based Labeling of 3D Shape Regions with Approximate Inference · CVPR 2022 |
Geometric modeling and processing
point cloud processing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SHRED: 3D Shape Region Decomposition with Learned Local Operations · ACM Trans. Graph. 2022 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation
shape segmentation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SHRED: 3D Shape Region Decomposition with Learned Local Operations · ACM Trans. Graph. 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
grammar-based parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | The Neurally-Guided Shape Parser: Grammar-based Labeling of 3D Shape Regions with Approximate Inference · CVPR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
region splitting · 0.6region merging · 0.6neural guide network · 0.6learned local operations · 0.6approximate inference · 0.6MAP inference · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | The Neurally-Guided Shape Parser: Grammar-based Labeling of 3D Shape Regions with Approximate InferenceabstractWe propose the Neurally-Guided Shape Parser (NGSP), a method that learns how to assign fine-grained semantic labels to regions of a 3D shape. NGSP solves this problem via MAP inference, modeling the posterior probability of a label assignment conditioned on an input shape with a learned likelihood function. To make this search tractable, NGSP employs a neural guide network that learns to approximate the posterior. NGSP finds high-probability label assignments by first sampling proposals with the guide network and then evaluating each proposal under the full likelihood. We evaluate NGSP on the task of fine-grained semantic segmentation of man ufactured 3D shapesfrom PartNet, where shapes have been decomposed into regions that correspond to part instance over-segmentations. We find that NGSP delivers significant performance improvements over comparison methods that (i) use regions to group per-point predictions, (ii) use regions as a self-supervisory signal or (iii) assign labels to regions under alternative formulations. Further, we show that NGSP maintains strong performance even with limited labeled data or noisy input shape regions. Finally, we demonstrate that NGSP can be directly applied to CAD shapes found in online repositories and validate its effectiveness with a perceptual study. R. Kenny Jones, Aalia Habib, Rana Hanocka, Daniel Ritchie 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2022 | SHRED: 3D Shape Region Decomposition with Learned Local OperationsabstractWe present SHRED, a method for 3D SHape REgion Decomposition. SHRED takes a 3D point cloud as input and uses learned local operations to produce a segmentation that approximates fine-grained part instances. We endow SHRED with three decomposition operations: splitting regions, fixing the boundaries between regions, and merging regions together. Modules are trained independently and locally, allowing SHRED to generate high-quality segmentations for categories not seen during training. We train and evaluate SHRED with fine-grained segmentations from PartNet; using its merge-threshold hyperparameter, we show that SHRED produces segmentations that better respect ground-truth annotations compared with baseline methods, at any desired decomposition granularity. Finally, we demonstrate that SHRED is useful for downstream applications, out-performing all baselines on zero-shot fine-grained part instance segmentation and few-shot finegrained semantic segmentation when combined with methods that learn to label shape regions. R. Kenny Jones, Aalia Habib, Daniel Ritchie 0001 |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 2 |