Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Baoqing Cai

dblp:322/1643 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Database system architecture and tuning · 67% Machine learning and data management · 27% Transaction processing and concurrency control · 6%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database system architecture and tuning › configuration tuning
knob tuning
0.912025
SCompression: Enhancing Database Knob Tuning Efficiency Through Slice-Based OLTP Workload Compression · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Database system architecture and tuning › workload management
workload reduction
0.912025
SCompression: Enhancing Database Knob Tuning Efficiency Through Slice-Based OLTP Workload Compression · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Database system architecture and tuning › database tuning
cloud database tuning
0.612022
HUNTER: An Online Cloud Database Hybrid Tuning System for Personalized Requirements · SIGMOD Conference 2022
Database system architecture and tuning
configuration tuning
0.612022
HUNTER: An Online Cloud Database Hybrid Tuning System for Personalized Requirements · SIGMOD Conference 2022
Machine learning and data management › learned database components
learned configuration tuning
0.612022
HUNTER: An Online Cloud Database Hybrid Tuning System for Personalized Requirements · SIGMOD Conference 2022
Machine learning and data management
learned database components
0.612022
HUNTER: An Online Cloud Database Hybrid Tuning System for Personalized Requirements · SIGMOD Conference 2022
Transaction processing and concurrency control
OLTP
0.312025
SCompression: Enhancing Database Knob Tuning Efficiency Through Slice-Based OLTP Workload Compression · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025
Cloud and datacenter computing
database-as-a-service
0.212022
HUNTER: An Online Cloud Database Hybrid Tuning System for Personalized Requirements · SIGMOD Conference 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

random forest · 1.1principal component analysis · 1.1genetic algorithm · 1.1deep reinforcement learning · 1.1slice-based compression · 0.9cluster-based sampling · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SCompression: Enhancing Database Knob Tuning Efficiency Through Slice-Based OLTP Workload Compression
abstract
Workload execution can account for 90% of the total database knob tuning time, which is often the bottleneck for efficient knob tuning in practice. Reducing the tuning time by using a compressed workload is a natural solution. However, many existing workload compression methods are designed for OLAP workloads, which reduce the number of queries needed for analysis tasks by sampling a small subset of queries. These methods are less effective for OLTP workloads in knob-tuning tasks, as they often disregard essential contextual details, including query sequence and concurrency. As a result, configurations that perform well on the compressed OLTP workload may not deliver similar competitive performance on the original workload. To address these challenges, we first define the objective of OLTP workload compression for knob tuning. We then propose a slice-based compression method, SCompression , which compresses workloads by slicing based on time intervals while preserving concurrency. SCompression achieves the objective by focusing on generating a compressed workload that (1) executes faster than the original workload and (2) produces performance variations similar to the source workload under different configurations. SCompression works in three steps: (1) dividing the workload into segments to capture regular performance fluctuations, (2) slicing each segment to preserve concurrency and transaction context, and (3) sampling slices under execution time constraints using a cluster-based approach to ensure representativeness. Finally, SCompression replays the compressed workload to produce the performance that mirrors the source workload. Extensive experiments on real-world and benchmark OLTP workloads show that SCompression is a cost-effective solution for knob tuning, accelerating tuning by up to 40× with only a 5% performance reduction.
Baoqing Cai, Yu Liu 0040, Lin Ma 0006, Pingqi Huang, Bingcheng Lian, Ke Zhou 0001, Jia Yuan, Xiaofan Cai, Peijun Wu
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2022 HUNTER: An Online Cloud Database Hybrid Tuning System for Personalized Requirements
abstract
Recently, using machine learning for performance tuning of cloud database (CDB) service has shown great potentials. However, facing personalized requirements such as various restrictions for tuning with very different workloads, pre-trained models may mismatch or recommend suboptimal configurations given a new workload. On the other hand, if the system tunes configurations in an online fashion, the system will suffer from the cold start problem, resulting in long tuning time and performance fluctuation. To accommodate these problems, we propose an online CDB tuning system called HUNTER. The key feature of HUNTER is a hybrid architecture, which uses samples generated by Genetic Algorithm to warm-start the finer grained exploration of deep reinforcement learning. Meanwhile, we employ Principal Component Analysis, Random Forest, and Fast Exploration Strategy to reduce the search space and the update time of the learning model. In addition, we further propose a clone and parallelization scheme to stress-test workloads on multiple cloned CDB instances (CDBs), resulting in faster and safer configuration exploration. Extensive trials on CDB with public and real-world workloads demonstrate that, given the same time budget and resources, HUNTER improves performance and considerably decreases recommendation time compared to state-of-the-art tuning systems, with accelerations of up to 2.8× and 22.8× utilizing 1 and 20 cloned CDBs, respectively.
Baoqing Cai, Yu Liu 0040, Ce Zhang 0001, Ke Zhou 0001, Li Liu 0047, Chunhua Li 0002, Jiashu Xing
SIGMOD Conference1