Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Steinmann
dblp:322/5261
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 68% Segmentation and scene understanding · 12% 3D vision · 10% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
concept bottleneck model |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Object-Centric Concept-Bottlenecks · NeurIPS 2025 Learning to Intervene on Concept Bottlenecks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Object-Centric Concept-Bottlenecks · NeurIPS 2025 Learning to Intervene on Concept Bottlenecks · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
concept-based models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Object-Centric Concept-Bottlenecks · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › scene understanding
object understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Object-Centric Concept-Bottlenecks · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
concept intervention |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Intervene on Concept Bottlenecks · ICML 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Neural Concept Binder · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
object representation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Neural Concept Binder · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Intervene on Concept Bottlenecks · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
object-centric foundation models · 0.9concept aggregation · 0.9retrieval-based inference · 0.8memory · 0.8intervention generalization · 0.8hierarchical clustering · 0.8GPT-4 · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Object-Centric Concept-BottlenecksabstractDeveloping high-performing, yet interpretable models remains a critical challenge in modern AI. Concept-based models (CBMs) attempt to address this by extracting human-understandable concepts from a global encoding (e.g., image encoding) and then applying a linear classifier on the resulting concept activations, enabling transparent decision-making. However, their reliance on holistic image encodings limits their expressiveness in object-centric real-world settings and thus hinders their ability to solve complex vision tasks beyond single-label classification. To tackle these challenges, we introduce Object-Centric Concept Bottlenecks (OCB), a framework that combines the strengths of CBMs and pre-trained object-centric foundation models, boosting performance and interpretability. We evaluate OCB on complex image datasets and conduct a comprehensive ablation study to analyze key components of the framework, such as strategies for aggregating object-concept encodings. The results show that OCB outperforms traditional CBMs and allows one to make interpretable decisions for complex visual tasks. David Steinmann, Wolfgang Stammer, Antonia Wüst, Kristian Kersting |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | Right on Time: Revising Time Series Models by Constraining Their Explanations
Maurice Kraus, David Steinmann, Antonia Wüst, Andre Kokozinski, Kristian Kersting |
ECML/PKDD (7) | 2 |
| 2024 | Learning to Intervene on Concept BottlenecksabstractWhile deep learning models often lack interpretability, concept bottleneck models (CBMs) provide inherent explanations via their concept representations. Moreover, they allow users to perform interventional interactions on these concepts by updating the concept values and thus correcting the predictive output of the model. Up to this point, these interventions were typically applied to the model just once and then discarded. To rectify this, we present concept bottleneck memory models (CB2Ms), which keep a memory of past interventions. Specifically, CB2Ms leverage a two-fold memory to generalize interventions to appropriate novel situations, enabling the model to identify errors and reapply previous interventions. This way, a CB2M learns to automatically improve model performance from a few initially obtained interventions. If no prior human interventions are available, a CB2M can detect potential mistakes of the CBM bottleneck and request targeted interventions. Our experimental evaluations on challenging scenarios like handling distribution shifts and confounded data demonstrate that CB2Ms are able to successfully generalize interventions to unseen data and can indeed identify wrongly inferred concepts. Hence, CB2Ms are a valuable tool for users to provide interactive feedback on CBMs, by guiding a user’s interaction and requiring fewer interventions. David Steinmann, Wolfgang Stammer, Felix Friedrich, Kristian Kersting |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Neural Concept BinderabstractThe challenge in object-based visual reasoning lies in generating concept representations that are both descriptive and distinct. Achieving this in an unsupervised manner requires human users to understand the model's learned concepts and, if necessary, revise incorrect ones. To address this challenge, we introduce the Neural Concept Binder (NCB), a novel framework for deriving both discrete and continuous concept representations, which we refer to as "concept-slot encodings". NCB employs two types of binding: "soft binding", which leverages the recent SysBinder mechanism to obtain object-factor encodings, and subsequent "hard binding", achieved through hierarchical clustering and retrieval-based inference. This enables obtaining expressive, discrete representations from unlabeled images. Moreover, the structured nature of NCB's concept representations allows for intuitive inspection and the straightforward integration of external knowledge, such as human input or insights from other AI models like GPT-4. Additionally, we demonstrate that incorporating the hard binding mechanism preserves model performance while enabling seamless integration into both neural and symbolic modules for complex reasoning tasks. We validate the effectiveness of NCB through evaluations on our newly introduced CLEVR-Sudoku dataset. Wolfgang Stammer, Antonia Wüst, David Steinmann, Kristian Kersting |
NeurIPS | 3 |