Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
P. Andrew Penz
dblp:322/7177
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1990
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless sensing and localization · 50% Physical-layer communications · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications › signal analysis › signal classification
emitter recognition |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Radar signal categorization using a neural network · Proc. IEEE 1990 |
Wireless sensing and localization
radar signal processing |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Radar signal categorization using a neural network · Proc. IEEE 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural network · 0.0energy-minimizing attractor network · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1990 | Radar signal categorization using a neural networkabstractNeural networks are used to analyze a complex simulated radar environment which contains noisy radar pulses generated by many different emitters. The neural network used is an energy-minimizing network. The limiting process contains the state vector within a set of limits, and this model is called the brain state in a box, or BSB model, which forms energy minima (attractors in the network dynamical system) based on learned input data. The system first determines how many emitters are present (the deinterleaving problem). Pulses from individual simulated emitters give rise to separate stable attractors in the network. Once individual emitters are characterized, it is possible to tentatively identify them based on their observed parameters. As a test of this idea, a neural network was used to form a small database that could potentially make emitter identification. There were three errors of classification. The number of iterations are required to reach an attractor state was very long, and some of the final states were not fully limited. These factors indicate the uncertainty of the neural network.> James A. Anderson, Michael T. Gately, P. Andrew Penz, Dean R. Collins |
Proc. IEEE | 3 |