Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chay Machluf

dblp:322/9905 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 75% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms
competitive analysis
0.612022
Competitive Vertex Recoloring · ICALP 2022
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph coloring
0.612022
Competitive Vertex Recoloring · ICALP 2022
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.612022
Competitive Vertex Recoloring · ICALP 2022
Approximation and online algorithms › online algorithms › online graph algorithms
online graph coloring
0.612022
Competitive Vertex Recoloring · ICALP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

lower bound · 0.6competitive analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Competitive Vertex Recoloring
Yossi Azar, Chay Machluf, Boaz Patt-Shamir, Noam Touitou
Algorithmica2
2022 Competitive Vertex Recoloring
abstract
Motivated by placement of jobs in physical machines, we introduce and analyze the problem of online recoloring, or online disengagement. In this problem, we are given a set of n weighted vertices and a k-coloring of the vertices (vertices represent jobs, and colors represent physical machines). Edges, representing conflicts between jobs, are inserted in an online fashion. After every edge insertion, the algorithm must output a proper k-coloring of the vertices. The cost of a recoloring is the sum of weights of vertices whose color changed. Our aim is to minimize the competitive ratio of the algorithm, i.e., the ratio between the cost paid by the online algorithm and the cost paid by an optimal, offline algorithm. We consider a couple of polynomially-solvable coloring variants. Specifically, for 2-coloring bipartite graphs we present an O(log n)-competitive deterministic algorithm and an Ω(log n) lower bound on the competitive ratio of randomized algorithms. For (Δ+1)-coloring, we present tight bounds of Θ(Δ) and Θ(logΔ) on the competitive ratios of deterministic and randomized algorithms, respectively (where Δ denotes the maximum degree). We also consider a dynamic case which allows edge deletions as well as insertions. All our algorithms are applicable to the case where vertices are weighted and the cost of recoloring a vertex is its weight. All our lower bounds hold even in the unweighted case.
Yossi Azar, Chay Machluf, Boaz Patt-Shamir, Noam Touitou
ICALP2