Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emanuele Francazi

dblp:323/8096 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 35% Optimization for machine learning · 32% Deep learning architectures and training · 12%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
1.422024
Initial Guessing Bias: How Untrained Networks Favor Some Classes · ICML 2024
A Theoretical Analysis of the Learning Dynamics under Class Imbalance · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › dataset bias
class bias
0.812024
Initial Guessing Bias: How Untrained Networks Favor Some Classes · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
weight initialization
0.812024
Initial Guessing Bias: How Untrained Networks Favor Some Classes · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance
0.712023
A Theoretical Analysis of the Learning Dynamics under Class Imbalance · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
0.712023
A Theoretical Analysis of the Learning Dynamics under Class Imbalance · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent
0.712023
A Theoretical Analysis of the Learning Dynamics under Class Imbalance · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning theory
learning dynamics
0.712023
A Theoretical Analysis of the Learning Dynamics under Class Imbalance · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.712023
A Theoretical Analysis of the Learning Dynamics under Class Imbalance · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical physics analysis · 0.8per-class gradient normalization · 0.7oversampling · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Initial Guessing Bias: How Untrained Networks Favor Some Classes
abstract
Understanding and controlling biasing effects in neural networks is crucial for ensuring accurate and fair model performance. In the context of classification problems, we provide a theoretical analysis demonstrating that the structure of a deep neural network (DNN) can condition the model to assign all predictions to the same class, even before the beginning of training, and in the absence of explicit biases. We prove that, besides dataset properties, the presence of this phenomenon, which we call Initial Guessing Bias (IGB), is influenced by model choices including dataset preprocessing methods, and architectural decisions, such as activation functions, max-pooling layers, and network depth. Our analysis of IGB provides information for architecture selection and model initialization. We also highlight theoretical consequences, such as the breakdown of node-permutation symmetry, the violation of self-averaging and the non-trivial effects that depth has on the phenomenon.
Emanuele Francazi, Aurélien Lucchi, Marco Baity-Jesi
ICML1
2023 A Theoretical Analysis of the Learning Dynamics under Class Imbalance
abstract
Data imbalance is a common problem in machine learning that can have a critical effect on the performance of a model. Various solutions exist but their impact on the convergence of the learning dynamics is not understood. Here, we elucidate the significant negative impact of data imbalance on learning, showing that the learning curves for minority and majority classes follow sub-optimal trajectories when training with a gradient-based optimizer. This slowdown is related to the imbalance ratio and can be traced back to a competition between the optimization of different classes. Our main contribution is the analysis of the convergence of full-batch (GD) and stochastic gradient descent (SGD), and of variants that renormalize the contribution of each per-class gradient. We find that GD is not guaranteed to decrease the loss for each class but that this problem can be addressed by performing a per-class normalization of the gradient. With SGD, class imbalance has an additional effect on the direction of the gradients: the minority class suffers from a higher directional noise, which reduces the effectiveness of the per-class gradient normalization. Our findings not only allow us to understand the potential and limitations of strategies involving the per-class gradients, but also the reason for the effectiveness of previously used solutions for class imbalancesuch as oversampling.
Emanuele Francazi, Marco Baity-Jesi, Aurélien Lucchi
ICML1