Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Niyati Chayya
dblp:324/1184
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44% Generative modeling · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation › concept representation
semantic spaces |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | The Psychology of Semantic Spaces: Experiments with Positive Emotion (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Modeling Constraints Can Identify Winning Arguments in Multi-Party Interactions (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
argumentation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Modeling Constraints Can Identify Winning Arguments in Multi-Party Interactions (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
computational linguistics |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | The Psychology of Semantic Spaces: Experiments with Positive Emotion (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical generative model · 1.1constraint-based modeling · 1.1BERT fine-tuning · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | The Psychology of Semantic Spaces: Experiments with Positive Emotion (Student Abstract)abstractPsychological concepts can help computational linguists to better model the latent semantic spaces of emotions, and understand the underlying states motivating the sharing or suppressing of emotions. This abstract applies the understanding of agency and social interaction in the happiness semantic space to its role in positive emotion. First, BERT-based fine-tuning yields an expanded seed set to understand the vocabulary of the latent space. Next, results benchmarked against many emotion datasets suggest that the approach is valid, robust, offers an improvement over direct prediction, and is useful for downstream predictive tasks related to psychological states. Kokil Jaidka, Niyati Chayya |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2022 | Modeling Constraints Can Identify Winning Arguments in Multi-Party Interactions (Student Abstract)abstractIn contexts where debate and deliberation is the norm, participants are regularly presented with new information that conflicts with their original beliefs. When required to update their beliefs (belief alignment), they may choose arguments that align with their worldview (confirmation bias). We test this and competing hypotheses in a constraint-based modeling approach to predict the winning arguments in multi-party interactions in the Reddit ChangeMyView dataset. We impose structural constraints that reflect competing hypotheses on a hierarchical generative Variational Auto-encoder. Our findings suggest that when arguments are further from the initial belief state of the target, they are more likely to succeed. Suzanna Sia, Kokil Jaidka, Niyati Chayya, Kevin Duh |
AAAI | 3 |