Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Melinda Chang
dblp:324/2975 · also Melinda Y. Chang
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computing education
software engineering education |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Theory of Scientific Programming Efficacy · ICSE 2024 |
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Theory of Scientific Programming Efficacy · ICSE 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interview study · 1.5grounded theory · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A Theory of Scientific Programming EfficacyabstractScientists write and maintain software artifacts to construct, validate, and apply scientific theories. Despite the centrality of software in their work, their practices differ significantly from those of professional software engineers. We sought to understand what makes scientists effective at their work and how software engineering practices and tools can be adapted to fit their workflows. We interviewed 25 scientists and support staff to understand their work. Then, we constructed a theory that relates six factors that contribute to their efficacy in creating and maintaining software systems. We present the theory in the form of a cycle of scientific computing efficacy and identify opportunities for improvement based on the six contributing factors. Elizaveta Pertseva, Melinda Chang, Ulia Zaman, Michael J. Coblenz |
ICSE | 2 |
| 2022 | Automating Detection of Papilledema in Pediatric Fundus Images with Explainable Machine LearningabstractPapilledema is an ophthalmic neurologic disorder in which increased intracranial pressure leads to swelling of the optic nerves. Undiagnosed papilledema in children may lead to blindness and may be a sign of life-threatening conditions, such as brain tumors. Robust and accurate clinical diagnosis of this syndrome can be facilitated by automated analysis of fundus images using deep learning, especially in the presence of challenges posed by pseudopapilledema that has similar fundus appearance but distinct clinical implications. We present a deep learning-based algorithm for the automatic detection of pediatric papilledema. Our approach is based on optic disc localization and detection of explainable papilledema indicators through data augmentation. Experiments on real-world clinical data demonstrate that our proposed method is effective with a diagnostic accuracy comparable to expert ophthalmologists1. Kleanthis Avramidis, Melinda Chang, Shri Narayanan |
ICIP | 3 |