Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lennart Rietdorf

dblp:324/8702 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 60% Trustworthy machine learning · 40%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
description-based classification
0.912025
Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics? · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable AI
0.912025
Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics? · AAAI 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics? · AAAI 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics? · AAAI 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model classification
0.912025
Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics? · AAAI 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 0.9CLIP · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics?
abstract
Accurately describing images with text is a foundation of explainable AI. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) like CLIP have recently addressed this by aligning images and texts in a shared embedding space, expressing semantic similarities between vision and language embeddings. VLM classification can be improved with descriptions generated by Large Language Models (LLMs). However, it is difficult to determine the contribution of actual description semantics, as the performance gain may also stem from a semantic-agnostic ensembling effect, where multiple modified text prompts act as a noisy test-time augmentation for the original one. We propose an alternative evaluation scenario to decide if a performance boost of LLM-generated descriptions is caused by such a noise augmentation effect or rather by genuine description semantics. The proposed scenario avoids noisy test-time augmentation and ensures that genuine, distinctive descriptions cause the performance boost. Furthermore, we propose a training-free method for selecting discriminative descriptions that work independently of classname-ensembling effects. Our approach identifies descriptions that effectively differentiate classes within a local CLIP label neighborhood, improving classification accuracy across seven datasets. Additionally, we provide insights into the explainability of description-based image classification using VLMs.
Pingchuan Ma 0006, Lennart Rietdorf, Dmytro Kotovenko, Vincent Tao Hu, Björn Ommer
AAAI2