Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Huizhong Guo 0001
dblp:325/5509-1
· DBLP profile ↗
shortlisted
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-0011-8612ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
7 papers |
Recommender systems · 65% Information retrieval · 35% | |
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 32% Language models and text generation · 32% Reinforcement learning · 28% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software testing · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems
fairness-aware recommendation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Enhancing New-item Fairness in Dynamic Recommender Systems · SIGIR 2025 Configurable Fairness for New Item Recommendation Considering Entry Time of Items · SIGIR 2024 |
Software testing › machine learning testing
fairness testing |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | FairRec: Fairness Testing for Deep Recommender Systems · ISSTA 2023 Fairness Testing for Recommender Systems · ISSTA 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Think When Needed: Model-Aware Reasoning Routing for LLM-based Ranking · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval › neural ranking model
LLM-based ranking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Think When Needed: Model-Aware Reasoning Routing for LLM-based Ranking · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Think When Needed: Model-Aware Reasoning Routing for LLM-based Ranking · SIGIR 2026 |
Information retrieval › evaluation
user simulation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Mirroring Users: Towards Building Preference-aligned User Simulator with User Feedback in Recommendation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward shaping |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Enhancing New-item Fairness in Dynamic Recommender Systems · SIGIR 2025 |
Recommender systems › graph-based recommendation
graph neural network recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LightKG: Efficient Knowledge-Aware Recommendations with Simplified GNN Architecture · KDD (2) 2025 |
Recommender systems
knowledge-aware recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LightKG: Efficient Knowledge-Aware Recommendations with Simplified GNN Architecture · KDD (2) 2025 |
Recommender systems › knowledge-aware recommendation
knowledge graph-based recommendation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LightKG: Efficient Knowledge-Aware Recommendations with Simplified GNN Architecture · KDD (2) 2025 |
Information retrieval › user interaction
user feedback |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Mirroring Users: Towards Building Preference-aligned User Simulator with User Feedback in Recommendation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | LightKG: Efficient Knowledge-Aware Recommendations with Simplified GNN Architecture · KDD (2) 2025 |
Recommender systems › context-aware recommendation
dynamic recommendation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Enhancing New-item Fairness in Dynamic Recommender Systems · SIGIR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
router head · 2.0reasoning routing · 2.0self-supervised learning · 1.7reward mechanism design · 1.7reinforcement learning · 1.7knowledge distillation · 1.7contrastive learning · 1.7large language model · 1.0two-stage training · 0.8fairness-guided training · 0.8re-ranking mitigation · 0.7double-ended discrete particle swarm optimization · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Mirroring Users: Towards Building Preference-aligned User Simulator with User Feedback in RecommendationabstractTianjun Wei, Huizhong Guo, Yingpeng Du, Zhu Sun, Huang Chen, Dongxia Wang, Jie Zhang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Tianjun Wei, Huizhong Guo 0001, Yingpeng Du, Zhu Sun 0001, Dongxia Wang 0002, Jie Zhang 0002 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2026 | Think When Needed: Model-Aware Reasoning Routing for LLM-based RankingabstractLarge language models (LLMs) are increasingly applied to ranking tasks in retrieval and recommendation. Although reasoning prompting can enhance ranking utility, our preliminary exploration reveals that its benefits are inconsistent and come at a substantial computational cost, suggesting that when to reason is as crucial as how to reason. To address this issue, we propose a reasoning routing framework that employs a lightweight, plug-and-play router head to decide whether to use direct inference (Non-Think) or reasoning (Think) for each instance before generation. The router head relies solely on pre-generation signals: i) compact ranking-aware features (e.g., candidate dispersion) and ii) model-aware difficulty signals derived from a diagnostic checklist reflecting the model's estimated need for reasoning. By leveraging these features before generation, the router outputs a controllable token that determines whether to apply the Think mode. Furthermore, the router can adaptively select its operating policy along the validation Pareto frontier at deployment time, enabling dynamic allocation of computational resources toward instances most likely to benefit from Think under varying system constraints. Experiments on three public ranking datasets with different scales of open-source LLMs show consistent improvements in ranking utility with reduced token consumption (e.g., +6.3% NDCG@10 with –49.5% tokens on MovieLens with Qwen3-4B), demonstrating reasoning routing as a practical solution to the accuracy-efficiency trade-off. Huizhong Guo 0001, Tianjun Wei, Dongxia Wang 0002, Yingpeng Du, Jie Zhang 0002, Zhu Sun 0001 |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2025 | LightKG: Efficient Knowledge-Aware Recommendations with Simplified GNN ArchitectureabstractRecently, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have become the dominant approach for Knowledge Graph-aware Recommender Systems (KGRSs) due to their proven effectiveness. Building upon GNN-based KGRSs, Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) has been incorporated to address the sparity issue, leading to longer training time. However, through extensive experiments, we reveal that: (1)compared to other KGRSs, the existing GNN-based KGRSs fail to keep their superior performance under sparse interactions even with SSL. (2) More complex models tend to perform worse in sparse interaction scenarios and complex mechanisms, like attention mechanism, can be detrimental as they often increase learning difficulty. Inspired by these findings, we propose LightKG, a simple yet powerful GNN-based KGRS to address sparsity issues. LightKG includes a simplified GNN layer that encodes directed relations as scalar pairs rather than dense embeddings and employs a linear aggregation framework, greatly reducing the complexity of GNNs. Additionally, LightKG incorporates an efficient contrastive layer to implement SSL. It directly minimizes the node similarity in original graph, avoiding the time-consuming subgraph generation and comparison required in previous SSL methods. Experiments on four benchmark datasets show that LightKG outperforms 12 competitive KGRSs in both sparse and dense scenarios while significantly reducing training time. Specifically, it surpasses the best baselines by an average of 5.8% in recommendation accuracy and saves 84.3% of training time compared to KGRSs with SSL. Our code is available at https://github.com/1371149/LightKG. Dongxia Wang 0002, Zhu Sun 0001, Haonan Zhang 0007, Huizhong Guo 0001 |
KDD (2) | 5 |
| 2025 | Enhancing New-item Fairness in Dynamic Recommender SystemsabstractNew-items play a crucial role in recommender systems (RSs) for delivering fresh and engaging user experiences. However, traditional methods struggle to effectively recommend new-items due to their short exposure time and limited interaction records, especially in dynamic recommender systems (DRSs) where new-items get continuously introduced and users' preferences evolve over time. This leads to significant unfairness towards new-items, which could accumulate over the successive model updates, ultimately compromising the stability of the entire system. Therefore, we propose FairAgent, a reinforcement learning (RL)-based new-item fairness enhancement framework specifically designed for DRSs. It leverages knowledge distillation to extract collaborative signals from traditional models, retaining strong recommendation capabilities for old-items. In addition, FairAgent introduces a novel reward mechanism for recommendation tailored to the characteristics of DRSs, which consists of three components: 1) a new-item exploration reward to promote the exposure of dynamically introduced new-items, 2) a fairness reward to adapt to users' personalized fairness requirements for new-items, and 3) an accuracy reward which leverages users' dynamic feedback to enhance recommendation accuracy. Extensive experiments on three public datasets and backbone models demonstrate the superior performance of FairAgent. The results present that FairAgent can effectively boost new-item exposure, achieve personalized new-item fairness, while maintaining high recommendation accuracy. Huizhong Guo 0001, Zhu Sun 0001, Dongxia Wang 0002, Tianjun Wei, Jie Zhang 0002 |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2024 | Configurable Fairness for New Item Recommendation Considering Entry Time of ItemsabstractRecommender systems tend to excessively expose longer-standing items, resulting in significant unfairness to new items with little interaction records, despite they may possess potential to attract considerable amount of users. The existing fairness-based solutions do not specifically consider the exposure fairness of new items, for which a systematic definition also lacks, discouraging the promotion of new items or contents. In this work, we introduce a multi-degree new-item exposure fairness definition, which considers item entry-time, and also is configurable regarding different fairness requirements. We then propose a configurable new-item fairness-aware framework named CNIF, which employs two-stage training where fairness degrees are incorporated for guidance. Extensive experiments on multiple popular datasets and backbone models demonstrate that CNIF can effectively enhance fairness of the existing models regarding the exposure resources of new items (including the brand-new items with no interaction). Specifically, CNIF demonstrates a substantial advancement with a 65.59% improvement in fairness metric and a noteworthy 9.97% improvement in recommendation accuracy compared to backbone models on the KuaiRec dataset. In comparison to various fairness-based solutions, it stands out by achieving the best trade-off between fairness and recommendation accuracy, surpassing the best baseline by 14.20%. Huizhong Guo 0001, Dongxia Wang 0002, Zhu Sun 0001, Haonan Zhang 0007, Jie Zhang 0002 |
SIGIR | 1 |
| 2023 | Fairness Testing for Recommender SystemsabstractThe topic of fairness in recommender systems (RSs) is gaining significant attention. However, current fairness metrics and testing approaches primarily cater to classification systems and are not suitable for RSs. To bridge this gap, we aim to address the specific challenges involved in fairness testing for RSs. In this paper, we present a novel testing approach specifically designed for RSs, which enables us to achieve accurate results while maintaining high efficiency. Additionally, we suggest potential avenues for further research in the realm of fairness testing for RSs. Huizhong Guo 0001 |
ISSTA | 1 |
| 2023 | FairRec: Fairness Testing for Deep Recommender SystemsabstractDeep learning-based recommender systems (DRSs) are increasingly and widely deployed in the industry, which brings significant convenience to people’s daily life in different ways. However, recommender systems are also shown to suffer from multiple issues, e.g., the echo chamber and the Matthew effect, of which the notation of “fairness” plays a core role. For instance, the system may be regarded as unfair to 1) a specific user, if the user gets worse recommendations than other users, or 2) an item (to recommend), if the item is much less likely to be exposed to the users than other items. While many fairness notations and corresponding fairness testing approaches have been developed for traditional deep classification models, they are essentially hardly applicable to DRSs. One major challenge is that there still lacks a systematic understanding and mapping between the existing fairness notations and the diverse testing requirements for deep recommender systems, not to mention further testing or debugging activities. To address the gap, we propose FairRec, a unified framework that supports fairness testing of DRSs from multiple customized perspectives, e.g., model utility, item diversity, item popularity, etc. We also propose a novel, efficient search-based testing approach to tackle the new challenge, i.e., double-ended discrete particle swarm optimization (DPSO) algorithm, to effectively search for hidden fairness issues in the form of certain disadvantaged groups from a vast number of candidate groups. Given the testing report, by adopting a simple re-ranking mitigation strategy on these identified disadvantaged groups, we show that the fairness of DRSs can be significantly improved. We conducted extensive experiments on multiple industry-level DRSs adopted by leading companies. The results confirm that FairRec is effective and efficient in identifying the deeply hidden fairness issues, e.g., achieving ∼95% testing accuracy with ∼half to 1/8 time. Huizhong Guo 0001, Jingyi Wang 0004, Dongxia Wang 0002, Zehong Hu, Rong Zhang 0006, Hui Xue 0001 |
ISSTA | 1 |