Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lauren A. Marsh
dblp:326/5161
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction
human-AI collaboration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Scholastic: Graphical Human-AI Collaboration for Inductive and Interpretive Text Analysis · UIST 2022 |
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics › visual text analytics
interactive topic modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Scholastic: Graphical Human-AI Collaboration for Inductive and Interpretive Text Analysis · UIST 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
machine-in-the-loop clustering · 1.1hierarchical document clustering · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Scholastic: Graphical Human-AI Collaboration for Inductive and Interpretive Text AnalysisabstractInterpretive scholars generate knowledge from text corpora by manually sampling documents, applying codes, and refining and collating codes into categories until meaningful themes emerge. Given a large corpus, machine learning could help scale this data sampling and analysis, but prior research shows that experts are generally concerned about algorithms potentially disrupting or driving interpretive scholarship. We take a human-centered design approach to addressing concerns around machine-assisted interpretive research to build Scholastic, which incorporates a machine-in-the-loop clustering algorithm to scaffold interpretive text analysis. As a scholar applies codes to documents and refines them, the resulting coding schema serves as structured metadata which constrains hierarchical document and word clusters inferred from the corpus. Interactive visualizations of these clusters can help scholars strategically sample documents further toward insights. Scholastic demonstrates how human-centered algorithm design and visualizations employing familiar metaphors can support inductive and interpretive research methodologies through interactive topic modeling and document clustering. Matt-Heun Hong, Lauren A. Marsh, Jessica L. Feuston, Janet Ruppert, Jed R. Brubaker, Danielle Albers Szafir |
UIST | 2 |