Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mohammadsadegh Khorasani

dblp:326/6227 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 35% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 15%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery
1.522025
Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Targeted Causal Interventions · ICML 2025
Novel Ordering-Based Approaches for Causal Structure Learning in the Presence of Unobserved Variables · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning
0.912025
Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Targeted Causal Interventions · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning › option discovery
subgoal discovery
0.912025
Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Targeted Causal Interventions · ICML 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning
0.712023
Novel Ordering-Based Approaches for Causal Structure Learning in the Presence of Unobserved Variables · AAAI 2023
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph learning
0.712023
Novel Ordering-Based Approaches for Causal Structure Learning in the Presence of Unobserved Variables · AAAI 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › sparse reward reinforcement learning
long-horizon sparse-reward tasks
0.312025
Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Targeted Causal Interventions · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for combinatorial optimization
0.212023
Novel Ordering-Based Approaches for Causal Structure Learning in the Presence of Unobserved Variables · AAAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.3hill-climbing search · 1.3erdős–rényi random graphs · 0.9causal graph · 0.9causal discovery · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning with Targeted Causal Interventions
abstract
Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) improves the efficiency of long-horizon reinforcement-learning tasks with sparse rewards by decomposing the task into a hierarchy of subgoals. The main challenge of HRL is efficient discovery of the hierarchical structure among subgoals and utilizing this structure to achieve the final goal. We address this challenge by modeling the subgoal structure as a causal graph and propose a causal discovery algorithm to learn it. Additionally, rather than intervening on the subgoals at random during exploration, we harness the discovered causal model to prioritize subgoal interventions based on their importance in attaining the final goal. These targeted interventions result in a significantly more efficient policy in terms of the training cost. Unlike previous work on causal HRL, which lacked theoretical analysis, we provide a formal analysis of the problem. Specifically, for tree structures and, for a variant of Erdős-Rényi random graphs, our approach results in remarkable improvements. Our experimental results on HRL tasks also illustrate that our proposed framework outperforms existing work in terms of training cost.
Mohammadsadegh Khorasani, Saber Salehkaleybar, Negar Kiyavash, Matthias Grossglauser
ICML1
2025 Efficiently Escaping Saddle Points for Policy Optimization
abstract
Policy gradient (PG) is widely used in reinforcement learning due to its scalability and good performance. In recent years, several variance-reduced PG methods have been proposed with a theoretical guarantee of converging to an approximate first-order stationary point (FOSP) with the sample complexity of $O(\epsilon^{-3})$. However, FOSPs could be bad local optima or saddle points. Moreover, these algorithms often use importance sampling (IS) weights which could impair the statistical effectiveness of variance reduction. In this paper, we propose a variance-reduced second-order method that uses second-order information in the form of Hessian vector products (HVP) and converges to an approximate second-order stationary point (SOSP) with sample complexity of $\tilde{O}(\epsilon^{-3})$. This rate improves the best-known sample complexity for achieving approximate SOSPs by a factor of $O(\epsilon^{-0.5})$. Moreover, the proposed variance reduction technique bypasses IS weights by using HVP terms. Our experimental results show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the state of the art and is more robust to changes in random seeds.
Mohammadsadegh Khorasani, Saber Salehkaleybar, Negar Kiyavash, Niao He, Matthias Grossglauser
UAI1
2023 Novel Ordering-Based Approaches for Causal Structure Learning in the Presence of Unobserved Variables
abstract
We propose ordering-based approaches for learning the maximal ancestral graph (MAG) of a structural equation model (SEM) up to its Markov equivalence class (MEC) in the presence of unobserved variables. Existing ordering-based methods in the literature recover a graph through learning a causal order (c-order). We advocate for a novel order called removable order (r-order) as they are advantageous over c-orders for structure learning. This is because r-orders are the minimizers of an appropriately defined optimization problem that could be either solved exactly (using a reinforcement learning approach) or approximately (using a hill-climbing search). Moreover, the r-orders (unlike c-orders) are invariant among all the graphs in a MEC and include c-orders as a subset. Given that set of r-orders is often significantly larger than the set of c-orders, it is easier for the optimization problem to find an r-order instead of a c-order. We evaluate the performance and the scalability of our proposed approaches on both real-world and randomly generated networks.
Ehsan Mokhtarian, Mohammadsadegh Khorasani, Jalal Etesami, Negar Kiyavash
AAAI2