Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marcus Kühn
dblp:328/1871
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-3919-2519ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 57% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 33% Approximation and online algorithms · 10% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph matching
hypergraph matching |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Conflict-free hypergraph matchings · SODA 2023 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics
hypergraph |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | The Hypergraph Removal Process · STOC 2025 |
Approximation and online algorithms › approximation algorithms
randomized greedy algorithm |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Conflict-free hypergraph matchings · SODA 2023 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | The Hypergraph Removal Process
Felix Joos, Marcus Kühn |
STOC | 2 |
| 2023 | Conflict-free hypergraph matchingsabstractA celebrated theorem of Pippenger, and Frankl and Rödl states that every almost-regular, uniform hypergraph H with small maximum codegree has an almost-perfect matching. We extend this result by obtaining a conflict-free matching, where conflicts are encoded via a collection C of subsets C ⊆ E (H). We say that a matching M ⊆ E (H) is conflict-free if M does not contain an element of C as a subset. Under natural assumptions on C, we prove that H has a conflict-free, almost-perfect matching. This has many applications, one of which yields new asymptotic results for so-called “high-girth” Steiner systems. Our main tool is a polynomial time random greedy algorithm which we call the “conflict-free matching process”. * The full version of the paper can be accessed at https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.05564 Stefan Glock, Felix Joos, Marcus Kühn, Lyuben Lichev |
SODA | 4 |