Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Annie Ulichney

dblp:329/4574 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 75% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 25%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
auction design
0.812024
Fair Allocation in Dynamic Mechanism Design · NeurIPS 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
dynamic mechanism design
0.812024
Fair Allocation in Dynamic Mechanism Design · NeurIPS 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
fair division
0.812024
Fair Allocation in Dynamic Mechanism Design · NeurIPS 2024
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic foundations
cryptographic commitments
0.712023
BalanceProofs: Maintainable Vector Commitments with Fast Aggregation · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs
transparent setup
0.712023
BalanceProofs: Maintainable Vector Commitments with Fast Aggregation · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › commitment schemes
vector commitment
0.712023
BalanceProofs: Maintainable Vector Commitments with Fast Aggregation · USENIX Security Symposium 2023
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs
0.712023
BalanceProofs: Maintainable Vector Commitments with Fast Aggregation · USENIX Security Symposium 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

recursive optimization · 0.8approximation scheme · 0.8aggregation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Fair Allocation in Dynamic Mechanism Design
abstract
We consider a dynamic mechanism design problem where an auctioneer sells an indivisible good to two groups of buyers in every round, for a total of $T$ rounds. The auctioneer aims to maximize their discounted overall revenue while adhering to a fairness constraint that guarantees a minimum average allocation for each group. We begin by studying the static case ($T=1$) and establish that the optimal mechanism involves two types of subsidization: one that increases the overall probability of allocation to all buyers, and another that favors the group which otherwise has a lower probability of winning the item. We then extend our results to the dynamic case by characterizing a set of recursive functions that determine the optimal allocation and payments in each round. Notably, our results establish that in the dynamic case, the seller, on one hand, commits to a participation reward to incentivize truth-telling, and, on the other hand, charges an entry fee for every round. Moreover, the optimal allocation once more involves subsidization in favor of one group, where the extent of subsidization depends on the difference in future utilities for both the seller and buyers when allocating the item to one group versus the other. Finally, we present an approximation scheme to solve the recursive equations and determine an approximately optimal and fair allocation efficiently.
Alireza Fallah 0001, Michael I. Jordan, Annie Ulichney
NeurIPS3
2023 BalanceProofs: Maintainable Vector Commitments with Fast Aggregation
Weijie Wang 0001, Annie Ulichney, Charalampos Papamanthou
USENIX Security Symposium2
2022 Population-Based Hierarchical Non-Negative Matrix Factorization for Survey Data
abstract
Motivated by the problem of identifying potential hierarchical population structure on modern survey data containing a wide range of complex data types, we introduce population-based hierarchical non-negative matrix factorization (PHNMF). PHNMF is a variant of hierarchical non-negative matrix factorization based on feature similarity. As such, it enables an automatic and interpretable approach for identifying and understanding hierarchical structure in a data matrix constructed from a wide range of data types. Our numerical experiments on synthetic and real survey data demonstrate that PHNMF can recover latent hierarchical population structure in complex data with high accuracy. Moreover, the recovered subpopulation structure is meaningful and can be useful for improving downstream inference.
Xiaofu Ding, Olivia McGough, Chenxin Shen, Annie Ulichney, Ruiyao Xu, William Swartworth, Jocelyn T. Chi, Deanna Needell
BDCAT5