Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ioannis Pontikis

dblp:329/5210 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0001-3295-8534ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
trust in robots
0.812024
Benchmark Movement Data Set for Trust Assessment in Human Robot Collaboration · HRI 2024
Human-robot interaction › trust in robots
trust measurement
0.812024
Automatic Trust Estimation From Movement Data in Industrial Human-Robot Collaboration Based on Deep Learning · ICRA 2024
Human-robot interaction › human-robot collaboration
industrial human-robot collaboration
0.522024
Automatic Trust Estimation From Movement Data in Industrial Human-Robot Collaboration Based on Deep Learning · ICRA 2024
Benchmark Movement Data Set for Trust Assessment in Human Robot Collaboration · HRI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

questionnaire · 0.8motion tracking · 0.8deep learning · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Benchmark Movement Data Set for Trust Assessment in Human Robot Collaboration
abstract
Trust is a factor that is becoming more prominent in human robot interaction research. Only few approaches so far tackle the challenge of data-driven trust assessment. In this paper, we present a data set consisting of motion tracking data from an industrial human robot collaboration task. The data is collected during a trust manipulation experiment that has been designed to elicit different trust levels in the participants. Additionally, participants filled out a standard trust questionnaire. The data set allows for developing and testing data-driven trust assessment algorithms.
Matthias Rehm, Kasper Hald, Ioannis Pontikis
HRI3
2024 Automatic Trust Estimation From Movement Data in Industrial Human-Robot Collaboration Based on Deep Learning
abstract
Trust in automation is usually assessed with post-interaction questionnaires. For human robot collaboration it would be beneficial to assess the trust level during the interaction to adjust the robot’s collaboration behavior to the user expectations. In this paper we investigate if trust can be estimated from observable behavior like movements during the interaction with a large industrial manipulator. To this end, we report on a data collection for two tasks during collaborative draping, the transport of large cut pieces and the actual draping process in close proximity to the robot. The data is used to train and compare different deep learning models. Results show that automatic trust estimation is feasible, which opens up to using trust as a parameter for informing the interaction with robots.
Matthias Rehm, Ioannis Pontikis, Kasper Hald
ICRA2