Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

George Engelbeck

dblp:33/182 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
User interface design and tools · 59% Learning and educational technologies · 23% Usability and user experience research · 11%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
User interface design and tools › design guidelines
interface consistency
0.011986
A test of a common elements theory of transfer · CHI 1986
Learning and educational technologies › skill training
training transfer
0.011986
A test of a common elements theory of transfer · CHI 1986
Design research and methods
HCI theory
0.011986
A test of a common elements theory of transfer · CHI 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.0prototyping · 0.0regression · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Requirements for a virtual collocation environment
Steven E. Poltrock, George Engelbeck
Inf. Softw. Technol.2
1997 Requirements for a virtual collocation environment
abstract
We analyze how physically collocated teams work together now and what services they require to work together across distances, focusing on real time interactions because those interactions justify collocating teams today.We explain how Integrated Product Teams 0PT.s) are organized in system development programs and how their physical collocation facilitates communication, collaboration, and coordination within the team.Interactions witbin IPTs take two forms: scheduled meetings and opportunistic interactions.Scenarios of scheduled IPT meetings help motivate and identify requirements for supporting distributed meetings.Opportunistic interactions are far more common than scheduled meetings, and more difficult to observe and analyze because they are not scheduled or predictable.
Steven E. Poltrock, George Engelbeck
GROUP2
1989 The effects of device technology on the usability of advanced telephone functions
abstract
This paper presents a pilot study that addresses the effect that device technology has on the usability of advanced telephone functions. We prototyped telephone systems using three technologies: the current 12-button phone set, the current phone set augmented with speech synthesis, and a phone set augmented with a display and pointing device. The functions that we offered included call routing, call screening, and message retrieval. Experiments showed that a display-based phone was the fastest to use and was preferred; an interface that used voice-prompting was the slowest and least liked. This points out that future work on prompting interfaces will have to address user control and efficiency issues without causing learning/forgetting problems.
Teresa L. Roberts, George Engelbeck
CHI2
1986 A test of a common elements theory of transfer
abstract
All discussions of interface design criteria emphasize the importance of consistent operating procedures both within and across applications. This paper presents a model for positive transfer and thus a theoretical definition of consistency. An experiment manipulating training orders for utility tasks was designed to evaluate the transfer model. The experimental manipulations produced large transfer effects. Quantitative predictions were derived from the Kieras and Polson (1985) theory of human-computer interaction and the transfer model and fit using regression techniques. The transfer model accounted for 88% of the variance of the 31 cell means.
Peter G. Polson, Elizabeth Muncher, George Engelbeck
CHI3