Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amelia Shen

dblp:33/4807 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
boolean function manipulation
0.011995
Probabilistic manipulation of Boolean functions using free Boolean diagrams · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1995
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
equivalence checking
0.011995
Probabilistic manipulation of Boolean functions using free Boolean diagrams · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1995
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification
0.011995
Probabilistic manipulation of Boolean functions using free Boolean diagrams · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1995
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.011995
Probabilistic manipulation of Boolean functions using free Boolean diagrams · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic equivalence checking · 0.0free boolean diagram · 0.0binary decision diagram · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Probabilistic manipulation of Boolean functions using free Boolean diagrams
abstract
We propose a data structure for Boolean functions termed "the free Boolean diagram." A free Boolean diagram allows decision vertices as in the conventional binary decision diagram, but also allows function vertices corresponding to the AND and XOR functions. It has been shown previously that the equivalence of two free Boolean diagrams can be decided probabilistically in polynomial time. Based on the equivalence checking method, we develop a set of algorithms for the probabilistic construction of free Boolean diagrams from multilevel combinational logic circuits, and for their manipulation. These algorithms are modified versions of reduced, ordered binary decision diagram manipulation methods. We provide the implementation details of a free Boolean diagram package. We show that functions difficult to verify using reduced, ordered binary decision diagrams can be verified using the free Boolean diagrams package using substantially less memory.>
Amelia Shen, Srini Devadas, Abhijit Ghosh
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1
1993 Probabilistic construction and manipulation of free Boolean diagrams
abstract
We propose a data structure for Boolean functions termed the Free Boolean Diagram (FBD). We extend a previous result to show that the equivalence of two Free Boolean Diagrams can be decided probabilistically in polynomial time. Based on the equivalence checking method, we develop a set of algorithms for the probabilistic construction of Free Boolean Diagrams from multilevel combinational logic circuits, and for their manipulation. These algorithms are modified versions of ordered Binary Decision Diagram manipulation methods. We provide the implementation details of a Free Boolean Diagram package. Results on applying this package to problems in combinational logic verification are presented.
Amelia Shen, Srini Devadas, Abhijit Ghosh
ICCAD1
1992 On average power dissipation and random pattern testability of CMOS combinational logic networks
abstract
The implications of the observation that the probability of the occurrence of a transition on a wire of a circuit affects both the average power dissipation and the random pattern testability of a circuit are investigated. It is shown that restructuring a logic circuit can significantly affect its average power dissipation. Various methods for the synthesis of combinational logic networks are presented and the effect of different algorithms on the power dissipation of the circuit is demonstrated. The dual problem of improving the random pattern testability of logic circuits is emphasized. It is shown that modifying the signal probabilities can significantly affect the random pattern testability of a circuit.>
Amelia Shen, Abhijit Ghosh, Srini Devadas, Kurt Keutzer
ICCAD1