Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael Droettboom
dblp:33/6159
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 56% Audio and music processing · 44% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Audio and music processing › music information retrieval
optical music recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | A Comparative Study of Staff Removal Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008 |
Image and video processing
image segmentation |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | A Comparative Study of Staff Removal Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
skeletonization · 0.1robustness evaluation · 0.1error metrics · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Ten Simple Rules for Better FiguresabstractInternational audience Nicolas P. Rougier, Michael Droettboom, Philip E. Bourne |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |
| 2008 | A Comparative Study of Staff Removal AlgorithmsabstractThis paper presents a quantitative comparison of different algorithms for the removal of stafflines from music images. It contains a survey of previously proposed algorithms and suggests a new skeletonization based approach. We define three different error metrics, compare the algorithms with respect to these metrics and measure their robustness with respect to certain image defects. Our test images are computer-generated scores on which we apply various image deformations typically found in real-world data. In addition to modern western music notation our test set also includes historic music notation such as mensural notation and lute tablature. Our general approach and evaluation methodology is not specific to staff removal, but applicable to other segmentation problems as well. Christoph Dalitz, Michael Droettboom, Bastian Pranzas, Ichiro Fujinaga |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |