Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jack E. Pennington

dblp:33/6631 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 87% Legged, aerial and field robots · 13%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Immersive interaction · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › teleoperation › telerobotics
space telerobotics
0.011986
Space telerobotics: A few more hurdles · ICRA 1986
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
teleoperation
0.011986
Space telerobotics: A few more hurdles · ICRA 1986
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
space robotics
0.011986
Space telerobotics: A few more hurdles · ICRA 1986
Immersive interaction
telepresence
0.011986
Space telerobotics: A few more hurdles · ICRA 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

remote manned control · 0.0automation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Teleoperation to robotics at Langley Research Center
Jack E. Pennington
Appl. Intell.1
1986 Space telerobotics: A few more hurdles
abstract
Automation and robotics will have a major role in future space activities. Despite technological advances by universities and industry, several milestones must be reached before telerobotics technology is ready for a useful role on the Space Station. This paper discusses three of these hurdles: 1. Design of a telerobotic manipulator system which integrates remote manned control with automation and robotics. A new, unique design concept for such a system is discussed. 2. Technology that is developed and demonstrated in the lab must be integrated and validated for flight-scale systems. Current technology thrusts at NASA Langley Research Center are described, along with an approach to transferring the technology to flight. 3. Defining the role and quantifying the benefits of telerobotics. Possible roles as an adjunct and as an alternative to EVA are discussed.
Jack E. Pennington
ICRA1