Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael A. Riley
dblp:33/7373
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-3632-204XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 46% Vision and language · 23% Information extraction and text analysis · 23% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Immersive interaction · 50% Haptics and multimodal interaction · 50% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Application-Agnostic Automatic Target Recognition System Using Vision Language Models · AAAI 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
open-vocabulary object detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Application-Agnostic Automatic Target Recognition System Using Vision Language Models · AAAI 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › open vocabulary learning
open-vocabulary recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Application-Agnostic Automatic Target Recognition System Using Vision Language Models · AAAI 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | An Application-Agnostic Automatic Target Recognition System Using Vision Language Models · AAAI 2025 |
Haptics and multimodal interaction
haptic navigation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Route selection and obstacle avoidance with a short-range haptic sensory substitution device✰ · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2019 |
Immersive interaction › virtual reality locomotion › redirected walking
obstacle avoidance |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Route selection and obstacle avoidance with a short-range haptic sensory substitution device✰ · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 0.9kernel density estimation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Optimized classification of accurate and misarticulated American English rhotic speech sounds for use in gamified real-time ultrasound biofeedback therapyabstractGamified biofeedback has the potential to help individuals improve speech motor patterns. For such systems, feedback provided in response to attempted changes must directly characterize performance improvements. This is particularly the case for ultrasound biofeedback therapy (UBT), which is increasingly used to visualize tongue movement for treating misarticulations of speech sounds (e.g., American English /ɹ/). Previous studies on ultrasound imaging of misarticulated /ɹ/ sounds have established that a single, time-dependent measured parameter, δ (relative difference between normalized tongue dorsum and blade displacements) can classify articulatory accuracy, matching human judgments with about 85% agreement. The δ parameter thus is an ideal basis for real-time gamified UBT. However, during ultrasound imaging of a speech production, there are multiple possible image frames from which δ could be automatically evaluated to represent production accuracy. Accordingly, to identify the optimal frame selection for δ evaluation, ultrasound image sequences depicting 2,944 productions of 15 distinct rhotic phrases were analyzed, while perceptual accuracy was judged by trained listeners. Four different selection criteria were compared, with classification performance and optimal thresholds evaluated using receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis with 8-fold cross validation. For pre-vocalic and post-vocalic rhotic syllables, highest classification success rates resulted from evaluating δ at productions’ end. For pre-vocalic words preceded by the carrier phrase “a”, best classification resulted from evaluating δ at the estimated temporal midpoint of /ɹ/. Results provide a viable basis for gamified ultrasound biofeedback therapy based on real-time ultrasound measurements of tongue movements. Sarah A. Biehl, Sarah Dugan, Sarah R. Li, Reneé Seward, Michael A. Riley, Suzanne Boyce, T. Douglas Mast |
Speech Commun. | 5 |
| 2025 | An Application-Agnostic Automatic Target Recognition System Using Vision Language ModelsabstractWe present a novel Automatic Target Recognition (ATR) system using open-vocabulary object detection and classification models. A primary advantage of this approach is that target classes can be defined just before runtime by a non-technical end user, using either a few natural language text descriptions of the target, or a few image exemplars, or both. Nuances in the desired targets can be expressed in natural language, which is useful for unique targets with little or no training data. We also implemented a novel combination of several techniques to improve performance, such as leveraging the additional information in the sequence of overlapping frames to perform tubelet identification (i.e., sequential bounding box matching), bounding box re-scoring, and tubelet linking. Additionally, we developed a technique to visualize the aggregate output of many overlapping frames as a mosaic of the area scanned during the aerial surveillance or reconnaissance, and a kernel density estimate (or heatmap) of the detected targets. We initially applied this ATR system to the use case of detecting and clearing unexploded ordinance on airfield runways and we are currently extending our research to other real-world applications. Anthony Palladino, Dana Gajewski, Abigail Aronica, Patryk Deptula, Alexander Hamme, Seiyoung C. Lee, Jeff Muri, Todd Nelling, Michael A. Riley, Margaret Duff |
AAAI | 9 |
| 2021 | An Automatic, Simple Ultrasound Biofeedback Parameter for Distinguishing Accurate and Misarticulated Rhotic SyllablesabstractCharacterizing accurate vs. misarticulated patterns of tongue movement using ultrasound can be challenging in real time because of the fast, independent movement of tongue regions. The usefulness of ultrasound for biofeedback speech therapy is limited because speakers must mentally track and compare differences between their tongue movement and available models. It is desirable to automate this interpretive task using a single parameter representing deviation from known accurate tongue movements. In this study, displacements recorded automatically by ultrasound image tracking were transformed into a single biofeedback parameter (time-dependent difference between blade and dorsum displacements). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate this parameter as a predictor of production accuracy over a range of different vowel contexts with initial and final /r/ in American English. Areas under ROC curves were 0.8 or above, indicating that this simple parameter may provide useful real-time biofeedback on /r/ accuracy within a range of rhotic contexts. Sarah R. Li, Colin T. Annand, Sarah Dugan, Sarah M. Schwab, Kathryn J. Eary, Michael Swearengen, Sarah Stack, Suzanne Boyce, Michael A. Riley, T. Douglas Mast |
Interspeech | 9 |
| 2019 | Using Ultrasound Imaging to Create Augmented Visual Biofeedback for Articulatory Practice
Colin T. Annand, Maurice Lamb, Sarah Dugan, Sarah R. Li, Hannah M. Woeste, T. Douglas Mast, Michael A. Riley, Jack A. Masterson, Neeraja Mahalingam, Kathryn J. Eary, Caroline Spencer, Suzanne Boyce, Stephanie Jackson, Anoosha Baxi, Reneé Seward |
INTERSPEECH | 7 |
| 2019 | Route selection and obstacle avoidance with a short-range haptic sensory substitution device✰
Lorena Lobo, Patric Nordbeck, Vicente Raja, Anthony Chemero, Michael A. Riley, David M. Jacobs, David Travieso |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 5 |
| 2015 | Can Joint Action be Synergistic? Studying the Stabilization of Interpersonal Hand Coordination
Verónica Romero 0002, Rachel W. Kallen, Michael A. Riley, Michael J. Richardson |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2015 | The perception and memory of object properties: The role of attention, intention, and information detection
Brandon J. Thomas, Michael A. Riley |
CogSci | 2 |