Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Judith Yaaqoubi
dblp:33/9544
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 33% Human-robot interaction · 33% Accessibility and assistive technology · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction › social human-robot interaction › Cross-cultural HRI
cultural adaptation |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Adapting usability testing for oral, rural users · CHI 2011 |
Usability and user experience research › usability evaluation
usability testing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Adapting usability testing for oral, rural users · CHI 2011 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
ICT for development |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Adapting usability testing for oral, rural users · CHI 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
local staff facilitation · 0.2field study · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Adapting usability testing for oral, rural usersabstractTraditional usability methods are of limited use when evaluating systems designed for distant, diverse populations. In this paper, we describe a study conducted in two Ghanaian villages that evaluated an audio computer designed for people living in oral cultures. Informed by ICTD and orality-grounded HCID, we modified existing usability testing practices and we reflect on the utility of these adaptations. We found that conducting a culturally appropriate study often meant forgoing more traditional approaches in favor of flexible, opportunistic methods. We acknowledge the challenges of adapting traditional usability methods for oral, rural users. However, we found that by implementing strategic modifications led by local staff, our study produced valuable, actionable results. Trina Gorman, Emma J. Rose 0001, Judith Yaaqoubi, Andy Bayor, Beth E. Kolko |
CHI | 3 |