Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Judith Yaaqoubi

dblp:33/9544 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 33% Human-robot interaction · 33% Accessibility and assistive technology · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › social human-robot interaction › Cross-cultural HRI
cultural adaptation
0.112011
Adapting usability testing for oral, rural users · CHI 2011
Usability and user experience research › usability evaluation
usability testing
0.112011
Adapting usability testing for oral, rural users · CHI 2011
Computational social science and digital humanities
ICT for development
0.012011
Adapting usability testing for oral, rural users · CHI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

local staff facilitation · 0.2field study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Adapting usability testing for oral, rural users
abstract
Traditional usability methods are of limited use when evaluating systems designed for distant, diverse populations. In this paper, we describe a study conducted in two Ghanaian villages that evaluated an audio computer designed for people living in oral cultures. Informed by ICTD and orality-grounded HCID, we modified existing usability testing practices and we reflect on the utility of these adaptations. We found that conducting a culturally appropriate study often meant forgoing more traditional approaches in favor of flexible, opportunistic methods. We acknowledge the challenges of adapting traditional usability methods for oral, rural users. However, we found that by implementing strategic modifications led by local staff, our study produced valuable, actionable results.
Trina Gorman, Emma J. Rose 0001, Judith Yaaqoubi, Andy Bayor, Beth E. Kolko
CHI3