Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shuangtong Li
dblp:330/2001
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 47% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 32% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
decentralized learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Structured Cooperative Learning with Graphical Model Priors · ICML 2023 Learning to Collaborate in Decentralized Learning of Personalized Models · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Structured Cooperative Learning with Graphical Model Priors · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › model adaptation
personalized training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Structured Cooperative Learning with Graphical Model Priors · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Collaborate in Decentralized Learning of Personalized Models · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › model adaptation
personalized model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Collaborate in Decentralized Learning of Personalized Models · CVPR 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 0.7stochastic block model · 0.7expectation-maximization · 0.7attention · 0.7sparse topology · 0.6meta-learning · 0.6attention mechanism · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Structured Cooperative Learning with Graphical Model PriorsabstractWe study how to train personalized models for different tasks on decentralized devices with limited local data. We propose "Structured Cooperative Learning (SCooL)", in which a cooperation graph across devices is generated by a graphical model prior to automatically coordinate mutual learning between devices. By choosing graphical models enforcing different structures, we can derive a rich class of existing and novel decentralized learning algorithms via variational inference. In particular, we show three instantiations of SCooL that adopt Dirac distribution, stochastic block model (SBM), and attention as the prior generating cooperation graphs. These EM-type algorithms alternate between updating the cooperation graph and cooperative learning of local models. They can automatically capture the cross-task correlations among devices by only monitoring their model updating in order to optimize the cooperation graph. We evaluate SCooL and compare it with existing decentralized learning methods on an extensive set of benchmarks, on which SCooL always achieves the highest accuracy of personalized models and significantly outperforms other baselines on communication efficiency. Our code is available at https://github.com/ShuangtongLi/SCooL. Shuangtong Li, Tianyi Zhou 0001, Xinmei Tian 0001, Dacheng Tao |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Learning to Collaborate in Decentralized Learning of Personalized ModelsabstractLearning personalized models for user-customized computer-vision tasks is challenging due to the limited private-data and computation available on each edge device. Decentralized learning (DL) can exploit the images distributed over devices on a network topology to train a global model but is not designed to train personalized models for different tasks or optimize the topology. Moreover, the mixing weights used to aggregate neighbors' gradient messages in DL can be suboptimal for personalization since they are not adaptive to different nodes/tasks and learning stages. In this paper, we dynamically update the mixing-weights to improve the personalized model for each node's task and meanwhile learn a sparse topology to reduce communication costs. Our first approach, “learning to collaborate (L2C) ”, directly optimizes the mixing weights to minimize the local validation loss per node for a predefined set of nodes/tasks. In order to produce mixing weights for new nodes or tasks, we further develop “meta-L2C‘, which learns an attention mechanism to automatically assign mixing weights by comparing two nodes' model updates. We evaluate both methods on diverse benchmarks and experimental settings for image classification. Thorough comparisons to both classical and recent methods for IID/non-IID decentralized and federated learning demonstrate our method's advantages in identifying collaborators among nodes, learning sparse topology, and producing better personalized models with low communication and computational cost. Shuangtong Li, Tianyi Zhou 0001, Xinmei Tian 0001, Dacheng Tao |
CVPR | 1 |