Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Uri Stern
dblp:330/4730
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-5083-7001ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 37% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 27% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
overfitting |
2.6 | 3 | 2026 | Forget Me Not: Fighting Local Overfitting With Knowledge Fusion and Distillation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 On Local Overfitting and Forgetting in Deep Neural Networks · AAAI 2025 United We Stand: Using Epoch-Wise Agreement of Ensembles to Combat Overfit · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
ensemble learning |
1.9 | 3 | 2026 | On Local Overfitting and Forgetting in Deep Neural Networks · AAAI 2025 United We Stand: Using Epoch-Wise Agreement of Ensembles to Combat Overfit · AAAI 2024 Forget Me Not: Fighting Local Overfitting With Knowledge Fusion and Distillation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Forget Me Not: Fighting Local Overfitting With Knowledge Fusion and Distillation · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On Local Overfitting and Forgetting in Deep Neural Networks · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
early stopping |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | United We Stand: Using Epoch-Wise Agreement of Ensembles to Combat Overfit · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
knowledge distillation · 2.6forgetting rate score · 1.0checkpoint ensembling · 1.0ensemble learning · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Forget Me Not: Fighting Local Overfitting With Knowledge Fusion and DistillationabstractOverfitting in deep neural networks occurs less frequently than expected. This is a puzzling observation, as theory predicts that greater model capacity should eventually lead to overfitting - yet this is rarely seen in practice. But what if overfitting does occur, not globally, but in specific sub-regions of the data space? In this work, we introduce a novel score that measures the forgetting rate of deep models on validation data, capturing what we term local overfitting: a performance degradation confined to certain regions of the input space. We demonstrate that local overfitting can arise even without conventional overfitting, and is closely linked to the double descent phenomenon. Building on these insights, we introduce a two-stage approach that leverages the training history of a single model to recover and retain forgotten knowledge: first, by aggregating checkpoints into an ensemble, and then by distilling it into a single model of the original size, thus enhancing performance without added inference cost. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets, modern architectures, and training regimes validate the effectiveness of our approach. Notably, in the presence of label noise, our method - Knowledge Fusion followed by Knowledge Distillation - outperforms both the original model and independently trained ensembles, achieving a rare win-win scenario: reduced training and inference complexity. Uri Stern, Eli Corn, Daphna Weinshall |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2025 | On Local Overfitting and Forgetting in Deep Neural NetworksabstractThe infrequent occurrence of overfitting in deep neural networks is perplexing: contrary to theoretical expectations, increasing model size often enhances performance in practice. But what if overfitting does occur, though restricted to specific sub-regions of the data space? In this work, we propose a novel score that captures the forgetting rate of deep models on validation data. We posit that this score quantifies local overfitting: a decline in performance confined to certain regions of the data space. We then show empirically that local overfitting occurs regardless of the presence of traditional overfitting. Using the framework of deep over-parametrized linear models, we offer a certain theoretical characterization of forgotten knowledge, and show that it correlates with knowledge forgotten by real deep models. Finally, we devise a new ensemble method that aims to recover forgotten knowledge, relying solely on the training history of a single network. When combined with knowledge distillation, this method will enhance the performance of a trained model without adding inference costs. Extensive empirical evaluations demonstrate the efficacy of our method across multiple datasets, contemporary neural network architectures, and training protocols. Uri Stern, Tomer Yaacoby, Daphna Weinshall |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | United We Stand: Using Epoch-Wise Agreement of Ensembles to Combat OverfitabstractDeep neural networks have become the method of choice for solving many classification tasks, largely because they can fit very complex functions defined over raw data. The downside of such powerful learners is the danger of overfit. In this paper, we introduce a novel ensemble classifier for deep networks that effectively overcomes overfitting by combining models generated at specific intermediate epochs during training. Our method allows for the incorporation of useful knowledge obtained by the models during the overfitting phase without deterioration of the general performance, which is usually missed when early stopping is used. To motivate this approach, we begin with the theoretical analysis of a regression model, whose prediction - that the variance among classifiers increases when overfit occurs - is demonstrated empirically in deep networks in common use. Guided by these results, we construct a new ensemble-based prediction method, where the prediction is determined by the class that attains the most consensual prediction throughout the training epochs. Using multiple image and text classification datasets, we show that when regular ensembles suffer from overfit, our method eliminates the harmful reduction in generalization due to overfit, and often even surpasses the performance obtained by early stopping. Our method is easy to implement and can be integrated with any training scheme and architecture, without additional prior knowledge beyond the training set. It is thus a practical and useful tool to overcome overfit. Uri Stern, Daniel Shwartz, Daphna Weinshall |
AAAI | 1 |