Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Akash Kumar 0010

dblp:330/4760 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 50% Learning theory · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.912025
A Gap Between the Gaussian RKHS and Neural Networks: An Infinite-Center Asymptotic Analysis · COLT 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network function space
0.912025
A Gap Between the Gaussian RKHS and Neural Networks: An Infinite-Center Asymptotic Analysis · COLT 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

infinite-width analysis · 0.9asymptotic analysis · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A Gap Between the Gaussian RKHS and Neural Networks: An Infinite-Center Asymptotic Analysis
abstract
Recent works have characterized the function-space inductive bias of infinite-width bounded-norm single-hidden-layer neural networks as a kind of bounded-variation-type space. This novel neural network Banach space encompasses many classical multivariate function spaces, including certain Sobolev spaces and the spectral Barron spaces. Notably, this Banach space also includes functions that exhibit less classical regularity, such as those that only vary in a few directions. On bounded domains, it is well-established that the Gaussian reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) strictly embeds into this Banach space, demonstrating a clear gap between the Gaussian RKHS and the neural network Banach space. It turns out that when investigating these spaces on unbounded domains, e.g., all of $\mathbb{R}^d$, the story is fundamentally different. We establish the following fundamental result: Certain functions that lie in the Gaussian RKHS have infinite norm in the neural network Banach space. This provides a nontrivial gap between kernel methods and neural networks by exhibiting functions that kernel methods easily represent, whereas neural networks cannot.
Akash Kumar 0010, Rahul Parhi, Mikhail Belkin
COLT1
2023 Robust Empirical Risk Minimization with Tolerance
abstract
Developing simple, sample-efficient learning algorithms for robust classification is a pressing issue in today’s tech-dominated world, and current theoretical techniques requiring exponential sample complexity and complicated improper learning rules fall far from answering the need. In this work we study the fundamental paradigm of (robust) \textit{empirical risk minimization} (RERM), a simple process in which the learner outputs any hypothesis minimizing its training error. RERM famously fails to robustly learn VC classes \citep{Omar19}, a bound we show extends even to ‘nice’ settings such as (bounded) halfspaces. As such, we study a recent relaxation of the robust model called \textit{tolerant} robust learning \citep{Urner22} where the output classifier is compared to the best achievable error over slightly larger perturbation sets. We show that under geometric niceness conditions, a natural tolerant variant of RERM is indeed sufficient for $\gamma$-tolerant robust learning VC classes over $\mathbb{R}^d$, and requires only $\tilde{O}\left( \frac{VC(H)d\log \frac{D}{\gamma\delta}}{\epsilon^2}\right)$ samples for robustness regions of (maximum) diameter $D$.
Robi Bhattacharjee, Max Hopkins, Akash Kumar 0010, Hantao Yu, Kamalika Chaudhuri
ALT3