Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ho Zong Sien
dblp:330/9265
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
drug side effect prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Neural Collective Matrix Factorization for integrated analysis of heterogeneous biomedical data · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genotype-phenotype association
gene-disease association prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Neural Collective Matrix Factorization for integrated analysis of heterogeneous biomedical data · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
heterogeneous data integration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Neural Collective Matrix Factorization for integrated analysis of heterogeneous biomedical data · Bioinform. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural network · 0.6graph embedding · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Neural Collective Matrix Factorization for integrated analysis of heterogeneous biomedical dataabstractMOTIVATION: In many biomedical studies, there arises the need to integrate data from multiple directly or indirectly related sources. Collective matrix factorization (CMF) and its variants are models designed to collectively learn from arbitrary collections of matrices. The latent factors learnt are rich integrative representations that can be used in downstream tasks, such as clustering or relation prediction with standard machine-learning models. Previous CMF-based methods have numerous modeling limitations. They do not adequately capture complex non-linear interactions and do not explicitly model varying sparsity and noise levels in the inputs, and some cannot model inputs with multiple datatypes. These inadequacies limit their use on many biomedical datasets. RESULTS: To address these limitations, we develop Neural Collective Matrix Factorization (NCMF), the first fully neural approach to CMF. We evaluate NCMF on relation prediction tasks of gene-disease association prediction and adverse drug event prediction, using multiple datasets. In each case, data are obtained from heterogeneous publicly available databases and used to learn representations to build predictive models. NCMF is found to outperform previous CMF-based methods and several state-of-the-art graph embedding methods for representation learning in our experiments. Our experiments illustrate the versatility and efficacy of NCMF in representation learning for seamless integration of heterogeneous data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/ajayago/NCMF_bioinformatics. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Ragunathan Mariappan, Aishwarya Jayagopal, Ho Zong Sien, Vaibhav Rajan |
Bioinform. | 3 |