Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Scott Thomas Andersen
dblp:331/0648
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-1225-6312ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 61% Software maintenance and evolution · 30% Empirical software engineering · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation › code documentation generation
code comment generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ComCat: Expertise-Guided Context Generation to Enhance Code Comprehension · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026 |
Software maintenance and evolution › program comprehension
code comprehension |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ComCat: Expertise-Guided Context Generation to Enhance Code Comprehension · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ComCat: Expertise-Guided Context Generation to Enhance Code Comprehension · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026 |
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | ComCat: Expertise-Guided Context Generation to Enhance Code Comprehension · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.0expertise-guided context · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ComCat: Expertise-Guided Context Generation to Enhance Code ComprehensionabstractSoftware maintenance constitutes a substantial portion of the total lifetime costs of software, with a significant portion attributed to code comprehension. Software comprehension is eased by documentation such as comments that summarize and explain code. We present ComCat , an approach to automate comment generation by augmenting Large Language Models (LLMs) with expertise-guided context to target the annotation of source code with comments that improve comprehension. Our approach enables the selection of the most relevant and informative comments for a given snippet or file containing source code. We develop the ComCat pipeline to comment C/C++ files by (1) automatically identifying suitable locations in which to place comments, (2) predicting the most helpful type of comment for each location, and (3) generating a comment based on the selected location and comment type. In a human subject evaluation, we demonstrate that ComCat -generated comments significantly improve developer code comprehension across three indicative software engineering tasks by up to 13% for 80% of participants. In addition, we demonstrate that ComCat -generated comments are at least as accurate and readable as human-generated comments and are preferred over standard ChatGPT-generated comments for up to 92% of snippets of code. Furthermore, we develop and release a dataset containing source code snippets, human-written comments, and human-annotated comment categories. ComCat leverages LLMs to offer a significant improvement in code comprehension across a variety of human software engineering tasks. Skyler Grandel, Scott Thomas Andersen, Yu Huang 0015, Kevin Leach |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 2 |